Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Individuality, freedom and socialism: the British idealists' critiques of the Fichtean state

Tyler, Colin

Authors

Profile Image

Professor Colin Tyler C.Tyler@hull.ac.uk
Associate Dean (Research) in the Faculty of Business, Law and Politics, & Professor of Social and Political Thought



Abstract

Together with utilitarianism, British idealism dominated Anglo-American philosophy from the 1870s until the end of the First World War. This article counters a persisting criticism of the British idealists: that they endorsed the allegedly oppressive and static theory of the state associated with German idealists, especially J. G. Fichte. The article introduces the British idealists' reputation as Fichtean collectivists and provides an overview of leading current interpretations of Fichte's political thought. It then analyses T. H. Green's use of Fichtean terminology against the background of Fichte's reception in Britain in the 1860s and 1870s. Edward Caird's interpretation of - and alternative to - Fichte's socialism is analysed, followed by an examination of the readings of William Wallace and Bernard Bosanquet. It is concluded that these British idealists rejected the alleged Fichtean centralism for which they have been condemned, and did so on grounds that retain force in contemporary debates between Fichte scholars.

Citation

Tyler, C. (2015). Individuality, freedom and socialism: the British idealists' critiques of the Fichtean state. Political studies, 63(2), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12108

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 25, 2013
Online Publication Date Jan 27, 2014
Publication Date 2015-06
Print ISSN 0032-3217
Electronic ISSN 1467-9248
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 63
Issue 2
Pages 319-335
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12108
Keywords Sociology and Political Science
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/429149