Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia and their family carers in the UK: the VALID research programme including RCT

Wenborn, Jennifer; Mountain, Gail; Moniz-Cook, Esme; Poland, Fiona; King, Michael; Omar, Rumana; O'keeffe, Aidan; Morris, Stephen; Pizzo, Elena; Michie, Susan; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra; Graff, Maud; Hill, Jane; Challis, David; Russell, Ian; Sackley, Catherine; Hynes, Sinéad; Crellin, Nadia; Mundy, Jacqueline; Burgess, Jane; Swinson, Tom; Di Bona, Laura; Field, Becky; Hart, Cathryn; Stansfeld, Jacki; Walton, Holly; Rooks, Sally; Ledgerd, Ritchard; Orrell, Martin

Authors

Jennifer Wenborn

Gail Mountain

Profile image of Esme Moniz-Cook

Professor Esme Moniz-Cook E.D.Moniz-Cook@hull.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor of Clinical Psychology of Ageing and Dementia Care Research / Dementia Research Work Group Lead

Fiona Poland

Michael King

Rumana Omar

Aidan O'keeffe

Stephen Morris

Elena Pizzo

Susan Michie

Myrra Vernooij-Dassen

Maud Graff

Jane Hill

David Challis

Ian Russell

Catherine Sackley

Sinéad Hynes

Nadia Crellin

Jacqueline Mundy

Jane Burgess

Tom Swinson

Laura Di Bona

Becky Field

Cathryn Hart

Jacki Stansfeld

Holly Walton

Sally Rooks

Ritchard Ledgerd

Martin Orrell



Abstract

Background: People with dementia find it increasingly difficult to carry out daily activities (activities of daily living), and may require increasing support from family carers. Researchers in the Netherlands developed the Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia intervention, which was delivered in 10 1-hour sessions over 5 weeks to people with dementia and their family carers at home. Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia was found to be clinically effective and cost-effective. Objectives: Translate and adapt Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia to develop the Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version intervention and training programme and to optimise its suitability for use within the UK. To estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version for people with mild to moderate dementia and their family carers compared with treatment as usual. Design: The development phase used mixed methods to develop Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version: translation, expert review, and adaptation of the manual and training materials; training occupational therapists; focus groups and interviews, including occupational therapists, managers, people with dementia and family carers; consensus conference; and an online survey of occupational therapists to scope UK practice. A multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind individually randomised pragmatic trial was preceded by an internal pilot. Pairs were randomly allocated between Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version and treatment as usual. A cost–utility analysis, fidelity study and qualitative study were also completed. Setting: Community services for people with dementia across England. Participants: People with mild to moderate dementia recruited in pairs with a family carer/supporter. Interventions: Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version is an activity-based, goal-setting approach for people with dementia and family carers, and is delivered at home by an occupational therapist for 10 hours over 10 weeks. Treatment as usual comprised the usual local service provision, which may or may not include standard occupational therapy. Main outcome measures: Data were collected through interviews conducted in person with dyads at baseline and at 12 and 26 weeks post randomisation, and then over the telephone with a reduced sample of just carers at 52 and 78 weeks post randomisation. The primary outcome was the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale at 26 weeks. The secondary outcomes were as follows: person with dementia – cognition, activities of daily living, quality of life and mood; carer – sense of competence, quality of life and mood; all participants – social contacts, leisure activities and serious adverse events. Results: The Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia manual and training materials were translated and reviewed. In total, 44 occupational therapists were trained and delivered Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia to 130 pairs. A total of 197 occupational therapists completed the survey, of whom 138 also provided qualitative data. In total, 31 people attended the consensus conference. Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version has more flexibility than Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia in terms of content and delivery; for example, occupational therapists can use the wider range of assessment tools that are already in regular use within UK practice and the time span for delivery is 10 weeks to better meet the needs of pairs and be more feasible for services to deliver. In total, 31 occupational therapists provided Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version within the randomised controlled trial. A total of 468 pairs were randomised (249 pairs to Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version, 219 pairs to treatment as usual). People with dementia ranged in age from 55 to 97 years (mean 78.6 years), and family carers ranged in age from 29 to 94 years (mean 69.1 years). The majority of those with dementia (74.8%) were married; 19.2% lived alone. Most family carers (72.6%) were spouses but 22.2% were adult children. At 26 weeks, 406 (87%) pairs remained in the trial, and the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale total score did not differ at the 5% level when comparing groups (adjusted mean difference estimate 0.35, 95% confidence interval –0.81 to 1.51; p = 0.55). The adjusted (for baseline Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale total score and randomised group) intracluster correlation coefficient estimate at week 26 was 0.043. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. At 52 and 78 weeks, there were no differences between the two groups in Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale total score and secondary outcomes. The probability that Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version is cost-effective at a threshold of willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life-year of £20,000 is 0.02%. In the qualitative interviews, participants reported positive benefits and outcomes. Of the 249 pairs allocated to Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version, 227 reached the goal-setting phase, and 838 of the 920 goals set (90.8%) were fully or partially achieved. Limitations: The development phase took longer than estimated because of translation time and organisational delays in delivering the intervention. Recruitment to the randomised controlled trial took longer than expected. Fidelity overall was moderate, with variation across sites and therapists. It is possible that Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version did not work well in the UK service model in which usual care differs from that in the Netherlands. Conclusions: This programme used a rigorous process to develop Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version but found no statistical evidence of clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness compared with usual care. Qualitative findings provided positive examples of how Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia-the UK version had enabled people to live well with dementia.

Citation

Wenborn, J., Mountain, G., Moniz-Cook, E., Poland, F., King, M., Omar, R., …Orrell, M. (2023). Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia and their family carers in the UK: the VALID research programme including RCT. Programme Grants for Applied Research, 11(5), vii-76. https://doi.org/10.3310/RGTJ7429

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 22, 2022
Publication Date 2023-06
Deposit Date Jul 19, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 21, 2023
Journal Programme Grants for Applied Research
Print ISSN 2050-4322
Electronic ISSN 2050-4330
Publisher NIHR Journals Library
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 11
Issue 5
Pages vii-76
DOI https://doi.org/10.3310/RGTJ7429
Keywords Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Informatics; Health Policy
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4335939
Publisher URL https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar/RGTJ7429/#/abstract
Additional Information Free to read: This content has been made freely available to all.; contractual_start_date: 01-2012; editorial review begun: 02-2019; Accepted for publication: 04-2022

Files

Published report (3.8 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2023 Wenborn et al. This work was produced by Wenborn et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations