Dr Justin Morris J.C.Morris@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer/ Director of Undergraduate Admissions
The responsibility to protect and the use of force: remaking the procrustean bed?
Morris, Justin
Authors
Abstract
The emergence of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) owed much to the need to enhance the UN’s ability to act forcibly in the face of the most extreme cases of gross human suffering. Too often in the past such responses were emasculated or thwarted by the necessity to successfully navigate the UN Charter’s prescriptions over the use of force, by the unwillingness of member states to provide military forces, or by a combination of the two. In accepting that certain types of inhuman activity can lead to the legitimate use of force within the UN Charter framework, the adoption of R2P appeared to resolve at least some of these problems, and as such it offered hope to those wishing to see the UN adopt a more assertive response to the grossest of human rights abuses. But, using stalemate over Syria as its backdrop, this article demonstrates the dubiousness of the claim that such a normative development can ever trump the hard edged political and strategic factors which determine when states will accept and/or participate in the use of force, and it suggests a radical solution to the dangers inherent in R2P’s intimate association with military intervention.
Citation
Morris, J. (2016). The responsibility to protect and the use of force: remaking the procrustean bed?. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715612852
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 27, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 18, 2015 |
Publication Date | 2016-06 |
Deposit Date | Apr 27, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 27, 2016 |
Journal | Cooperation and conflict |
Print ISSN | 0010-8367 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 51 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 200-215 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715612852 |
Keywords | Military intervention; Norms; Responsibility to protect; Security Council; Syria |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/437200 |
Publisher URL | http://cac.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/11/14/0010836715612852 |
Additional Information | Author's accepted manuscript of article published in: Cooperation and conflict, 2015, v.51, issue 2 |
Contract Date | Apr 27, 2016 |
Files
Article.pdf
(159 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 University of Hull
You might also like
The responsibility to protect: A long view
(2017)
Book Chapter
The responsibility not to veto: A responsibility too far?
(2016)
Book Chapter
The responsibility to protect and the great powers: the tensions of dual responsibility
(2015)
Journal Article
Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum
(2013)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search