Susan Bright
The key to change
Bright, Susan; Whitehouse, Lisa
Authors
Lisa Whitehouse
Abstract
IN BRIEF • Four out of five people facing eviction may receive no legal help. • A “one-stop” advice shop should be available before the hearing. • There needs to be more “eye-catching” information to encourage defendants to attend court. Following our report on the housing possession process which raised questions concerning whether there is effective access to justice (see “Losing a home”, NLJ, 20 June 2014, p 16), we held a seminar to discuss the issues raised. Key actors involved in the possession process—judges, housing advisers, claimant representatives, policy makers, court administrators—imagined how the process might be improved. There were two key themes that emerged. The first focused around the low levels of defendant participation in possession cases: notwithstanding the fact that the home is under threat, many defendants do not receive legal advice and do not actively participate in the court process. This matters not only because of the importance of participation to procedural justice, but also because of its impact on outcome. Research suggests that there is a relationship between attendance and more favourable decisions to the defendant. The second area of interest was on eviction by private landlords. This is highly topical as the government has established a working party “to examine proposals to speed up the process of evicting during a tenancy tenants who do not pay rent promptly or fail to meet other contractual obligations”.
Citation
Bright, S., & Whitehouse, L. (2014). The key to change. New Law Journal, 164(7619), 13-14
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Aug 15, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Jun 17, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 17, 2016 |
Journal | New law journal |
Print ISSN | 0306-6479 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 164 |
Issue | 7619 |
Pages | 13-14 |
Keywords | Housing possession process |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/439800 |
Publisher URL | https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/key-change |
Additional Information | This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article published in New law journal, 2014, v.164 issue 7619. |
Contract Date | Jun 17, 2016 |
Files
Article.pdf
(307 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 LexisNexis
You might also like
Housing Possession in the Time of Pandemic
(2021)
Journal Article
Mortgage possession at a crossroads: which way should we turn?
(2019)
Journal Article
Improving procedural fairness in housing possession cases
(2019)
Journal Article
Empirical research methods in property law
(2015)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search