Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Measuring older people’s socioeconomic position: a scoping review of studies of self-rated health, health service and social care use

Spiers, Gemma Frances; Liddle, Jennifer E.; Stow, Daniel; Searle, Ben; Whitehead, Ishbel Orla; Kingston, Andrew; Moffatt, Suzanne; Matthews, Fiona E.; Hanratty, Barbara

Authors

Gemma Frances Spiers

Jennifer E. Liddle

Daniel Stow

Ben Searle

Ishbel Orla Whitehead

Andrew Kingston

Suzanne Moffatt

Barbara Hanratty



Abstract

Background The challenges of measuring socioeconomic position in older populations were first set out two decades ago. However, the question of how best to measure older people’s socioeconomic position remains pertinent as populations age and health inequalities widen. Methods A scoping review aimed to identify and appraise measures of socioeconomic position used in studies of health inequalities in older populations in high-income countries. Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, HMIC and references lists of systematic reviews were searched for observational studies of socioeconomic health inequalities in adults aged 60 years and over, published between 2000 and 2020. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Findings One-hundred and thirty-eight studies were included; 20 approaches to measuring socioeconomic position were identified. Few studies considered which pathways the chosen measures of socioeconomic position intended to capture. The validity of subjective socioeconomic position measures, and measures that assume shared income and educational capital, should be verified in older populations. Incomplete financial data risk under-representation of some older groups when missing data are socially patterned. Older study samples were largely homogeneous on measures of housing tenure, and to a lesser extent, measures of educational attainment. Measures that use only two response categories risk missing subtle differences in older people’s socioeconomic circumstances. Conclusion Poor choice of measures of socioeconomic position risk underestimating the size of health inequalities in older populations. Choice of measures should be shaped by considerations of theory, context and response categories that detect subtle, yet important, inequalities. Further evidence is required to ascertain the validity of some measures identified in this review.

Citation

Spiers, G. F., Liddle, J. E., Stow, D., Searle, B., Whitehead, I. O., Kingston, A., …Hanratty, B. (2022). Measuring older people’s socioeconomic position: a scoping review of studies of self-rated health, health service and social care use. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 76(6), 572-579. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-218265

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 17, 2022
Online Publication Date Mar 15, 2022
Publication Date Jun 1, 2022
Deposit Date Dec 16, 2023
Publicly Available Date Dec 21, 2023
Journal Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Print ISSN 0143-005X
Electronic ISSN 1470-2738
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 76
Issue 6
Pages 572-579
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-218265
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4451016

Files

Published article (414 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations