University of Hull logo

Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: conventional vs. Islamic banks

Mollah, Sabur; Zaman, Mahbub


Sabur Mollah


The performance and accountability of boards of directors and effectiveness of governance mechanisms continue to be a matter of concern. Focusing on differences between conventional banks and Islamic banks, we examine the effect of (i) Shari’ah supervision boards, (ii) board structure and (iii) CEO-power on performance during the period 2005–2011. We find Shari’ah supervision boards positively impact on Islamic banks’ performance when they perform a supervisory role, but the impact is negligible when they have only an advisory role. The effect of board structure (board size and board independence) and CEO power (CEO-chair duality and internally recruited CEO) on the performance of Islamic banks is overall negative. Our findings provide support for the positive contribution of Shari’ah supervision boards but also emphasize the need for enforcement and regulatory mechanism for them to be more effective.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2015-09
Journal Journal of banking and finance
Print ISSN 0378-4266
Electronic ISSN 1872-6372
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 58
Pages 418-435
Institution Citation Mollah, S., & Zaman, M. (2015). Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: conventional vs. Islamic banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 58, 418-435.
Keywords Shari’ah supervision, Corporate governance, Islamic banks, Boards of directors, Ethical banking
Publisher URL
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs. Islamic banks; Journal Title: Journal of Banking & Finance; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version:; Content Type: article; Copyright: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


You might also like

Downloadable Citations