David B. Grant
Using mixed methods in logistics and supply chain management research: current state and future directions
Grant, David B.; Shaw, Sarah; Sweeney, Edward; Bahr, Witold; Chaisurayakarn, Siriwan; Evangelista, Pietro
Authors
Dr Sarah Shaw Sarah.Shaw@hull.ac.uk
Reader in Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Edward Sweeney
Witold Bahr
Siriwan Chaisurayakarn
Pietro Evangelista
Abstract
Purpose: Mixed methods research is useful to enhance theoretical and practical research contributions. However, single methods have predominated much logistics and supply chain management (LSCM) research. This paper presents a review of mixed methods research across ten years in LSCM to determine their usage, identify benefits and inhibitors, and provide suggestions for LSCM researchers to realise the benefits from using mixed methods. Design/methodology/approach: This paper adopts a mixed methods approach through a quantitative analysis of methods used in six leading LSCM journals, an e-mail survey of mixed methods article authors during the review period, and four published case studies that used mixed methods. Findings: Only 144 (ten percent) of all empirical articles were published using mixed methods during the review period. A range of benefits and inhibitors regarding mixed methods adoption were found. Suggestions for LSCM authors include research training in mixed methods use and developing a project-specific research design due to the specificity and complexity associated with mixed methods research. Originality/value: LSCM is at a critical juncture, shaped by new contexts, themes and challenges, and would benefit from different research approaches and methods. This paper contributes to the LSCM domain through analysing the current state, benefits and inhibitors of mixed methods research in LSCM journals to provide a renewed call to action and guidelines for mixed methods LSCM research, and suggesting research design adaptation to enable agile and resilient research when investigating rapidly changing and complex phenomena.
Citation
Grant, D. B., Shaw, S., Sweeney, E., Bahr, W., Chaisurayakarn, S., & Evangelista, P. (2023). Using mixed methods in logistics and supply chain management research: current state and future directions. The international journal of logistics management, 34(7), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2023-0156
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 18, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 10, 2023 |
Publication Date | Dec 18, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Sep 19, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 24, 2024 |
Journal | International Journal of Logistics Management |
Print ISSN | 0957-4093 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 34 |
Issue | 7 |
Pages | 177-198 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2023-0156 |
Keywords | Research; Mixed methods; Single methods; Logistics; Supply chain management |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4461885 |
Files
Published article
(639 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
© David B. Grant, Sarah Shaw, Edward Sweeney, Witold Bahr, Siriwan Chaisurayakarn and Pietro Evangelista. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
You might also like
Logistics and Supply Chain Management Performance Measures
(2021)
Book Chapter
Servitization as a competitive difference in humanitarian logistics
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search