Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Overseeing criminal justice: The supervisory role of the public prosecution service in China

Mou, Yu

Authors

Yu Mou



Abstract

© 2017 The Author. Journal of Law and Society and 2017 Cardiff University Law School. The Chinese public prosecution service, the procuracy, is modelled on the Soviet Union system and has been accorded the controversial function of supervising other legal institutions in the criminal justice system. Drawing upon my own empirical data on the prosecution of crime in China, this article critically examines the way the power of supervision operates from an internal perspective. It argues that the power of supervision has been used as an institutional asset to secure the interests of the procuracy by analysing its oversight of police investigations and court decisions, the way prosecutors perceive themselves, and the efficacy of the supervision in a comparative context. The current status of the procuracy dictates that it is unable to undertake the role of supervision to safeguard the criminal process.

Citation

Mou, Y. (2017). Overseeing criminal justice: The supervisory role of the public prosecution service in China. Journal of Law and Society, 44(4), 620-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12060

Acceptance Date May 3, 2017
Online Publication Date Nov 28, 2017
Publication Date 2017-12
Deposit Date May 15, 2017
Publicly Available Date May 29, 2018
Journal The journal of law and society
Print ISSN 0263-323x
Electronic ISSN 1467-6478
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 44
Issue 4
Pages 620-645
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12060
Keywords Criminal justice; China; Public prosecution service; The People's Procuracy; Supervisory role
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/451376
Publisher URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12060/abstract
Additional Information This is a description of an article which has been accepted for future publication in: The journal of law and society. The article itself is not yet available for consultation.

Files

Article (244 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© The Authors 2017 This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Law and Society, v.44, issue 4, pages 620-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jols.12060




Downloadable Citations