Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

What really is nontokenistic fully inclusive patient and public involvement/engagement in research?

Hilton, Andrea; Megson, Molly; Aryankhesal, Aidin; Blake, Jessica; Rook, George; Irvine, Anne; Um, Jinpil; Killett, Anne; Maidment, Ian; Loke, Yoon; van Horik, Jayden; Fox, Chris; TIMES programme team

Authors

Molly Megson

Aidin Aryankhesal

Jessica Blake

George Rook

Anne Irvine

Jinpil Um

Anne Killett

Ian Maidment

Yoon Loke

Jayden van Horik

Chris Fox

TIMES programme team



Abstract

Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is critically important in healthcare research. A useful starting point for researchers to understand the scope of PPIE is to review the definition from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) as, ‘research being carried out “with”or “by”members of the public rather than “to”, “about”or “for”them’. PPIE does not refer to participation in research, but to actively shaping its direction. The ‘Effectiveness of a decision support tool to optimise community-based tailored management of sleep for people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (TIMES)’ study is funded through the NIHR programme grant for applied research. TIMES has thoroughly embraced PPIE by ensuring the person's voice is heard, understood, and valued. This editorial showcases how the TIMES project maximised inclusivity, and we share our experiences and top tips for other researchers. We base our reflections on the six key UK standards for public involvement; Inclusive Opportunities, Working Together, Support and Learning, Communications, Impactand Governance. We present our work, which had been co-led by our PPIEleads, academicsand partners including, together in dementia everyday, Innovations in Dementia, The UK Network of Dementia Voices (DementiaEngagement & Empowerment Project)and Liverpool Chinese Wellbeing. We have a Lived Experience Advisory Forum on Sleep, which includes people with dementia, family carers, representatives of the South Asian Community and the Chinese community.

Citation

Hilton, A., Megson, M., Aryankhesal, A., Blake, J., Rook, G., Irvine, A., Um, J., Killett, A., Maidment, I., Loke, Y., van Horik, J., Fox, C., & TIMES programme team. (2024). What really is nontokenistic fully inclusive patient and public involvement/engagement in research?. Health Expectations, 27(2), Article e14012. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.14012

Journal Article Type Editorial
Acceptance Date Feb 23, 2024
Online Publication Date Mar 15, 2024
Publication Date Apr 1, 2024
Deposit Date Mar 21, 2024
Publicly Available Date Mar 25, 2024
Journal Health Expectations
Print ISSN 1369-6513
Electronic ISSN 1369-7625
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Issue 2
Article Number e14012
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.14012
Keywords Epistemic justice; Inclusivity; Patient and public involvement and engagement
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4609633

Files

Published article (353 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations