Professor Thomas Lundmark T.Lundmark@hull.ac.uk
Professor and HK Bevan Chair in Law
Universals of legal reasoning by judges: A plea for candour in decision-making
Lundmark, Thomas
Authors
Abstract
Universals in Legal Reasoning by Judges explores and expounds the usage of rules to justify judicial decisions. Inspired by Savigny's canons of interpretation, and informed by the author's years of study and teaching in Germany, the book constructs a matrix for all legal argumentation in place of the so-called rules of interpretation, classifying justificatory arguments into four categories: textual, historical, purposive, and system-contextual. Along these categories, the book reveals certain universals while dispelling the confusion and mystery surrounding reasoning from judicial case decisions. This it does - simply and elegantly - by equating reasoning from case decisions with reasoning from statute. A myriad of examples, primarily from Germany, California, and the United Kingdom, show how these arguments find universal application. From start to finish, this book is itself an argument: an argument for judicial transparency and candour, which requires that judges reveal their thoughts and motivations-their ultimate reasons. This is necessary to enhance the persuasiveness and efficacy of judicial precedents, to foster democratic legitimacy, and to permit political accountability.
Citation
Lundmark, T. (2024). Universals of legal reasoning by judges: A plea for candour in decision-making. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785675.001.0001
Book Type | Book |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Mar 28, 2024 |
Publication Date | May 23, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Mar 22, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 29, 2026 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
ISBN | 9780198785675 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785675.001.0001 |
Keywords | legal reasoning, political judging, rules, principles, justifying, justification, glosses, Richterrecht, common law, statute law, statutory law, methods, argument, textual interpretation, historical interpretation, purposive interpretation, system-context |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4610120 |
Publisher URL | https://global.oup.com/academic/product/universals-of-legal-reasoning-by-judges-9780198785675?q=lundmark&lang=en&cc=nl# |
Additional Information | Universals of Legal Reasoning by Judges A Plea for Candour in Decision-Making Thomas Lundmark Demonstrates that legal reasoning is the same for statutes and case-law Exposes judicial reasoning as post-hoc rationalization Argues for judicial transparency about judges' ultimate reasons |
Files
This file is under embargo until Mar 29, 2026 due to copyright reasons.
Contact T.Lundmark@hull.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.
You might also like
Expropriations for Climate in Germany
(2024)
Book Chapter
Using statutes and cases in common and civil law
(2016)
Journal Article
Legal Science and European Harmonisation
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search