In search of alternative solutions : can the state of origin be held internationally responsible for investors' human rights abuses that are not attributable to it?

Tzevelekos, Vassilis

Abstract

The paper establishes a three-step (due diligence, positive effect of human rights and extraterritoriality) argument for the responsibility of the home state for the human right breaches of its investors in third countries.

Citation

Tzevelekos, V. (2010). In search of alternative solutions : can the state of origin be held internationally responsible for investors' human rights abuses that are not attributable to it?. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 35(1), 155-231

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: 2010
• Deposit Date: Nov 13, 2014
• Publicly Available Date: Nov 13, 2014
• Journal: Brooklyn journal of international law
• Print ISSN: 0740-4824
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 35
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 155-231
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/464597
• Publisher URL: http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol35/iss1/4/
• Additional Information: Copy of article : Vassilis Tzevelekos, In Search of Alternative Solutions: Can the State of Origin Be Held Internationally Responsible for Investors' Human Rights Abuses That Are Not Attributable to It?, 35 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2010). Available at: http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol35/iss1/4
• Contract Date: Nov 13, 2014