In search of alternative solutions : can the state of origin be held internationally responsible for investors' human rights abuses that are not attributable to it?
The paper establishes a three-step (due diligence, positive effect of human rights and extraterritoriality) argument for the responsibility of the home state for the human right breaches of its investors in third countries.
Tzevelekos, V. (2010). In search of alternative solutions : can the state of origin be held internationally responsible for investors' human rights abuses that are not attributable to it?. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 35(1), 155-231
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Deposit Date||Nov 13, 2014|
|Publicly Available Date||Nov 13, 2014|
|Journal||Brooklyn journal of international law|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Additional Information||Copy of article : Vassilis Tzevelekos, In Search of Alternative Solutions: Can the State of Origin Be Held Internationally Responsible for Investors' Human Rights Abuses That Are Not Attributable to It?, 35 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2010). Available at: http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol35/iss1/4|
Publisher Licence URL
Creative Commons Licence: Attribution 4.0 International License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Beyond responsibility to protect: Ceci N'Est Pas Une Pipe