Why is corruption less harmful to income inequality in Latin America?
Dobson, Stephen; Ramlogan-Dobson, Carlyn
Dr Carlyn Dobson Carlyn.Dobson@hull.ac.uk
Reader in Economics
Conventional wisdom says corruption is bad for income inequality. But recent research on Latin America finds a trade-off between corruption and inequality and suggests this is due to the large informal sector in the region. Using data on a large sample of countries we find that the informal sector impacts the link between corruption and inequality. In particular, the marginal impact of corruption becomes negative once the informal sector becomes large. This is true in Latin America and more generally. Corruption reducing policies should be accompanied by measures that help displaced informal sector workers. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Dobson, S., & Ramlogan-Dobson, C. (2012). Why is corruption less harmful to income inequality in Latin America?. World Development, 40(8), 1534-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.015
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Jan 30, 2012|
|Online Publication Date||May 12, 2012|
|Deposit Date||Nov 13, 2014|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Corruption; Latin America; Income inequality; Informal sector; Marginal impact|
You might also like
Is there club convergence in Latin America?
Is corruption really bad for inequality? Evidence from Latin America
Nonlinear time-series convergence: The role of structural breaks
Is there a trade-off between income inequality and corruption? Evidence from Latin America