Tom Bennett
Validation of field-based running tests to determine maximal aerobic speed in professional rugby league
Bennett, Tom; Marshall, Phil; Barrett, Steve; Malone, James; Simpson, Andrew; Bray, James; Christopherson, Calum; Nickolay, Tom; Metcalfe, James; Towlson, Chris
Authors
Mr Phil Marshall Phil.Marshall@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Strength & Conditioning
Steve Barrett
James Malone
Dr Andrew Simpson A.Simpson2@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer
Dr James Bray J.Bray@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Sport Nutrition & Physiology
Calum Christopherson
Tom Nickolay
James Metcalfe
Dr Christopher McLaren-Towlson C.Towlson@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Growth, maturation and talent identification of atheletes
Abstract
Practitioners place importance on high-speed running (HSR) to monitor training practice and match-play demands, whilst attempting to maximise fitness and minimize the risk of injury occurrence. Practitioners apply various methods to quantify HSR, such as absolute thresholds, percentage of maximum sprint speed and maximal aerobic speed (MAS). A recent survey demonstrates the 5-minute run and 1200m shuttle test (ST) to be implemented among rugby league practitioners to quantify HSR by incorporating MAS. However, it is unclear as to how valid these methods are to accurately quantify MAS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the validity of the 5-minute run and 1200m ST when compared to a gold standard measure for MAS. Twenty 1st team professional rugby league players competing in the European Super League participated in this study. Players were required to complete an incremental treadmill test, 5-minute run and 1200m ST over a two-week period in pre-season. MAS, peak heart rate (HRmax), peak lactate (Lapeak) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) where collected upon completion of each test. Results demonstrated the 1200m ST to have a higher correlation for MAS than the 5-minute run (1200m ST: r = 0.73, 5-minute run: r = 0.64). However, when assessing validity using the level of agreement between data, the 5-minute run underreported MAS by 0.45 m.s-1 whereas the 1200m ST underreported MAS by 0.77 m.s-1. Ultimately, both field-based tests used in this study underreport MAS when compared to an incremental treadmill test, although the 5-min-ute run provides a closer agreement and therefore a more valid measurement for MAS than the 1200m ST.
Citation
Bennett, T., Marshall, P., Barrett, S., Malone, J., Simpson, A., Bray, J., Christopherson, C., Nickolay, T., Metcalfe, J., & Towlson, C. (2024). Validation of field-based running tests to determine maximal aerobic speed in professional rugby league. PLoS ONE, 19(7 July), Article e0306062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306062
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 3, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 17, 2024 |
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Jul 5, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 23, 2024 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Print ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 7 July |
Article Number | e0306062 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306062 |
Keywords | 5-Minute Run; Maximal Aerobic Speed; High-speed running; Global Positioning Systems |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4732710 |
Files
Published article
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
Copyright: © 2024 Bennett et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
You might also like
The Effect of Complex Training on Physical Performance in Rugby League Players
(2023)
Journal Article
The Effect of Complex Training on Muscle Architecture in Rugby League Players
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search