Jane Minton
The Community IntraVenous Antibiotic Study (CIVAS): a mixed-methods evaluation of patient preferences for and cost-effectiveness of different service models for delivering outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy
Minton, Jane; Murray, Carolyn Czoski; Meads, David; Hess, Stephane; Vargas-Palacios, Armando; Mitchell, Elizabeth; Wright, Judy; Hulme, Claire; Raynor, David K; Gregson, Angela; Stanley, Philip; McLintock, Kate; Vincent, Rachel; Twiddy, Maureen
Authors
Carolyn Czoski Murray
David Meads
Stephane Hess
Armando Vargas-Palacios
Elizabeth Mitchell
Judy Wright
Claire Hulme
David K Raynor
Angela Gregson
Philip Stanley
Kate McLintock
Rachel Vincent
Dr Maureen Twiddy M.Twiddy@hull.ac.uk
Reader in Mixed Methods Research
Abstract
Background
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is widely used in most developed countries, providing considerable opportunities for improved cost savings. However, it is implemented only partially in the UK, using a variety of service models.
Objectives
The aims of this research were to (1) establish the extent of OPAT service models in England and identify their development; (2) evaluate patients’ preferences for different OPAT service delivery models; (3) assess the cost-effectiveness of different OPAT service delivery models; and (4) convene a consensus panel to consider our evidence and make recommendations.
Methods
This mixed-methods study included seven centres providing OPAT using four main service models: (1) hospital outpatient (HO) attendance; (2) specialist nurse (SN) visiting at home; (3) general nurse (GN) visiting at home; and (4) self-administration (SA) or carer administration. Health-care providers were surveyed and interviewed to explore the implementation of OPAT services in England. OPAT patients were interviewed to determine key service attributes to develop a discrete choice experiment (DCE). This was used to perform a quantitative analysis of their preferences and attitudes. Anonymised OPAT case data were used to model cost-effectiveness with both Markov and simulation modelling methods. An expert panel reviewed the evidence and made recommendations for future service provision and further research.
Results
The systematic review revealed limited robust literature but suggested that HO is least effective and SN is most effective. Qualitative study participants felt that different models of care were suited to different types of patient and they also identified key service attributes. The DCE indicated that type of service was the most important factor, with SN being strongly preferred to HO and SA. Preferences were influenced by attitudes to health care. The results from both Markov and simulation models suggest that a SN model is the optimal service for short treatment courses (up to 7 days). Net monetary benefit (NMB) values for HO, GN and SN services were £2493, £2547 and £2655, respectively. For longer treatment, SA appears to be optimal, although SNs provide slightly higher benefits at increased cost. NMB values for HO, GN, SN and SA services were £8240, £9550, £10,388 and £10,644, respectively. The simulation model provided useful information for planning OPAT services. The expert panel requested more guidance for service providers and commissioners. Overall, they agreed that mixed service models were preferable.
Limitations
Recruitment to the qualitative study was suboptimal in the very elderly and ethnic minorities, so the preferences of patients from these groups might not be represented. The study recruited from Yorkshire, so the findings may not be applicable nationally.
Conclusions
The quantitative preference analysis and economic modelling favoured a SN model, although there are differences between sociodemographic groups. SA provides cost savings for long-term treatment but is not appropriate for all.
Future work
Further research is necessary to replicate our results in other regions and populations and to evaluate mixed service models. The simulation modelling and DCE methods used here may be applicable in other health-care settings.
Citation
Minton, J., Murray, C. C., Meads, D., Hess, S., Vargas-Palacios, A., Mitchell, E., Wright, J., Hulme, C., Raynor, D. K., Gregson, A., Stanley, P., McLintock, K., Vincent, R., & Twiddy, M. (2017). The Community IntraVenous Antibiotic Study (CIVAS): a mixed-methods evaluation of patient preferences for and cost-effectiveness of different service models for delivering outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(6), 1-272. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05060
Acceptance Date | Oct 1, 2016 |
---|---|
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Dec 11, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 11, 2017 |
Journal | Health Services and Delivery Research |
Print ISSN | 2050-4349 |
Publisher | NIHR Journals Library |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 5 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 1-272 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05060 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/499837 |
Publisher URL | https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr05060/#/abstract |
Additional Information | Contractual start date: 02-2013; Editorial review begun: 12-2015; Accepted for publication: 06-2016 |
Contract Date | Dec 11, 2017 |
Files
CIVAS Final NIHR Report 2017
(3.2 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017. This work was produced by Minton et al. under the terms of a commissioning
contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and
study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement
is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be
addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre,
Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search