Hanna Fröhlich
Bisoprolol compared with carvedilol and metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure
Fröhlich, Hanna; Torres, Lorella; Täger, Tobias; Schellberg, Dieter; Corletto, Anna; Kazmi, Syed; Goode, Kevin; Grundtvig, Morten; Hole, Torstein; Katus, Hugo A.; Cleland, John G. F.; Atar, Dan; Clark, Andrew L.; Agewall, Stefan; Frankenstein, Lutz
Authors
Lorella Torres
Tobias Täger
Dieter Schellberg
Anna Corletto
Syed Kazmi
Dr Kevin Goode K.M.Goode@hull.ac.uk
Research Systems Project Manager / Business Analyst
Morten Grundtvig
Torstein Hole
Hugo A. Katus
John G. F. Cleland
Dan Atar
Andrew L. Clark
Stefan Agewall
Lutz Frankenstein
Abstract
© 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Aims: Beta-blockers are recommended for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it is disputed whether beta-blockers exert a class effect or whether there are differences in efficacy between agents. Methods and results: 6010 out-patients with stable CHF and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction prescribed either bisoprolol, carvedilol or metoprolol succinate were identified from three registries in Norway, England, and Germany. In three separate matching procedures, patients were individually matched with respect to both dose equivalents and the respective propensity scores for beta-blocker treatment. During a follow-up of 26,963 patient-years, 302 (29.5%), 637 (37.0%), and 1232 (37.7%) patients died amongst those prescribed bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol, respectively. In univariable analysis of the general sample, bisoprolol and carvedilol were both associated with lower mortality as compared with metoprolol succinate (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91, p < 0.01, and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.94, p < 0.01, respectively). Patients prescribed bisoprolol or carvedilol had similar mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82–1.08, p = 0.37). However, there was no significant association between beta-blocker choice and all-cause mortality in any of the matched samples (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.76–1.06; p = 0.20; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93–1.31, p = 0.24; and HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.95–1.22, p = 0.26 for bisoprolol vs. carvedilol, bisoprolol vs. metoprolol succinate, and carvedilol vs. metoprolol succinate, respectively). Results were confirmed in a number of important subgroups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the three beta-blockers investigated have similar effects on mortality amongst patients with CHF.
Citation
Fröhlich, H., Torres, L., Täger, T., Schellberg, D., Corletto, A., Kazmi, S., Goode, K., Grundtvig, M., Hole, T., Katus, H. A., Cleland, J. G. F., Atar, D., Clark, A. L., Agewall, S., & Frankenstein, L. (2017). Bisoprolol compared with carvedilol and metoprolol succinate in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 106(9), 711-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1115-0
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 11, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 22, 2017 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | May 23, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | May 23, 2018 |
Journal | Clinical Research in Cardiology |
Print ISSN | 1861-0684 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 106 |
Issue | 9 |
Pages | 711-721 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1115-0 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/535476 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00392-017-1115-0 |
Related Public URLs | http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/139786/13/139786.pdf |
Contract Date | May 23, 2018 |
Files
Article
(276 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2018 University of Hull
You might also like
Prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation in ambulatory patients with heart failure
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search