Andrew D Hicks
Do constructive trusts deter disloyalty?
Hicks, Andrew D
Authors
Abstract
Constructive trusts of disloyal fiduciary gain often are justified by the argument of deterrence. For there to be effective deterrence two conditions must be satisfied: first, potentially disloyal fiduciaries must be sufficiently informed, directly or indirectly, of the properties of the constructive trust; secondly, fiduciaries must respond by accurately weighing the costs/benefits of disloyalty and other options before choosing the option that maximises their self-interest. Typically one or both of these conditions will not be satisfied. Drawing upon insights from the behavioural sciences we find that fiduciaries contemplating disloyalty generally cannot be expected to be cognizant of the properties of the constructive trust therefore cannot be influenced by them. Even when known, such properties will not necessarily influence fiduciary behaviour due to the way well-informed fiduciaries are likely to perceive and process the risk their disloyalty will be detected. The deterrence gains generated by the recognition of a constructive trust therefore are likely to be negligible.
Citation
Hicks, A. D. (2018). Do constructive trusts deter disloyalty?. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 69(2), 147-173
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 4, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 8, 2018 |
Publication Date | 2018-06 |
Deposit Date | May 10, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 9, 2018 |
Print ISSN | 0029-3105 |
Publisher | Queen's University Belfast, School of Law |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 69 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 147-173 |
Series ISSN | 0029-3105 |
Keywords | Constructive trusts; Fiduciary loyalty; Deterrence; Behavioural economics |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/825006 |
Publisher URL | https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/90 |
Contract Date | May 10, 2018 |
Files
Do Constructive Trusts Deter
(612 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Proprietary relief in Boardman v Phipps
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search