Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation: a multi-method qualitative study

Pinto, Cathryn; Bristowe, Katherine; Witt, Jana; Davies, Joanna M.; de Wolf-Linder, Susanne; Dawkins, Marsha; Guo, Ping; Higginson, Irene J.; Daveson, Barbara; Murtagh, Fliss E.M.

Authors

Cathryn Pinto

Katherine Bristowe

Jana Witt

Joanna M. Davies

Susanne de Wolf-Linder

Marsha Dawkins

Ping Guo

Irene J. Higginson

Barbara Daveson



Abstract

Background: Routine use of outcome measures in palliative care is recommended to demonstrate and improve quality of care. The use of outcome measures is relatively recent in UK specialist palliative care services and understanding their use in practice is key to successful implementation. We therefore aimed to explore how patient-centred outcome measures are used in specialist palliative care, and identify key considerations for implementation.
Methods: Multi-method qualitative study (semi-structured interviews and non-participant observation). Patients, family caregivers and health professionals were purposively sampled from nine specialist palliative care services (hospice, hospital and community settings) in London, UK. Framework analysis, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), was undertaken.
Results: Thirty eight interviews and nine observations were conducted. Findings are presented according to the five CFIR domains: 1) Intervention: participants highlighted advantages, disadvantages and appropriateness of outcome measures in palliative care; 2) Outer setting: policy and national drivers are necessary to encourage use of outcome measures; 3) Inner setting: information technology infrastructure, organisational drive, and support from peers and leadership were institutional factors that shaped the use of outcome measures; 4) Individual: clear rationale for using outcome measures and skills to use them in practice were essential; 5) Implementation: stepwise introduction of outcome measures, regular feedback sessions, and champions/facilitators were important to strengthen routine use.
Conclusion: All CFIR domains need consideration for effective implementation. Outcome data needs to be fed back to and interpreted for professionals in order to improve and sustain outcome data collection, and drive meaningful improvements in palliative care.

Citation

Pinto, C., Bristowe, K., Witt, J., Davies, J. M., de Wolf-Linder, S., Dawkins, M., …Murtagh, F. E. (2018). Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation: a multi-method qualitative study. Annals of palliative medicine, 7(s3), S137-S150. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.09.02

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 20, 2018
Publication Date Oct 1, 2018
Deposit Date Aug 21, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal Annals of palliative medicine
Print ISSN 2224-5820
Electronic ISSN 2224-5839
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue s3
Pages S137-S150
DOI https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.09.02
Keywords Outcome assessment; Evaluation research; Palliative care; Qualitative research
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/991987
Publisher URL http://apm.amegroups.com/article/view/21366/21255

Files




Article (406 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© Annals of Palliative Medicine. All rights reserved.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations