Dr Martina McClean M.McClean@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer/ Education Lead for Law
German Constitutional Law in the UK Supreme Court
Künnecke, Martina
Authors
Abstract
The outgoing tide of EU law will be Britain’s most significant constitutional change in recent times. In an era of uncertainties, the UK Supreme Court proved to be a guardian of the constitutional role of Parliament. The case of Miller, decided in the UK Supreme Court in 2017, proved that point. The highest court in the UK has therefore gained an important place in the global community of Constitutional Courts. This global community finds its legitimacy in the recognition of common values as well as the recognition of national variations. This article analyses to which extent common values, and in particular those found in German law, have influenced decisions in the House of Lords and UK Supreme Court. To do so, the author analyses decisions by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court and extrajudicial speeches by the Justices of the Supreme Court for references to German constitutional law. It identifies and maps the themes that have attracted the attention of the justices of the Supreme Court. More recently, the UK Supreme Court has referred to judgments and extrajudicial writing by German Constitutional Court judges. This was in the context of constitutional questions relating to the tension between membership within the EU and national identity, a theme which has occupied German judges for some time. As well as that, the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights has sparked an interest in German jurisprudence, in particular in the principle of proportionality.
Citation
Künnecke, M. (2019). German Constitutional Law in the UK Supreme Court. Liverpool Law Review, 40(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09221-3
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 24, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 2, 2019 |
Publication Date | 2019-04 |
Deposit Date | Mar 8, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 8, 2019 |
Print ISSN | 0144-932X |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 40 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 31–47 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09221-3 |
Keywords | UK Supreme Court; Germany: Constitutional law |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/1366080 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10991-019-09221-3 |
Contract Date | Mar 8, 2019 |
Files
Article
(568 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
You might also like
Reflections on the Francovich Remedy
(2023)
Book Chapter
Translation in the EU: language and law in the EU's judicial labyrinth
(2013)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search