Dan Weaving
The relative contribution of training intensity and duration to daily measures of training load in professional rugby league and union
Weaving, Dan; Dalton-Barron, Nicholas; McLaren, Shaun; Scantlebury, Sean; Cummins, Cloe; Roe, Gregory; Jones, Ben; Beggs, Clive; Abt, Grant
Authors
Nicholas Dalton-Barron
Shaun McLaren
Sean Scantlebury
Cloe Cummins
Gregory Roe
Ben Jones
Clive Beggs
Grant Abt
Abstract
This study examined the relative contribution of exercise duration and intensity to team-sport athlete’s training load. Male, professional rugby league (n=10) and union (n=22) players were monitored over 6- and 52-week training periods, respectively. Whole-session (load) and per-minute (intensity) metrics were monitored (league: session rating of perceived exertion training load [sRPE-TL], individualised training impulse, total distance, BodyLoad™; union: sRPE-TL, total distance, high-speed running distance, PlayerLoad™). Separate principal component analyses were conducted on the load and intensity measures to consolidate raw data into principal components (PC, k =4). The first load PC captured 70% and 74% of the total variance in the rugby league and rugby union datasets, respectively. Multiple linear regression subsequently revealed that session duration explained 73% and 57% of the variance in first load PC, respectively, while the four intensity PCs explained an additional 24% and 34%, respectively. Across two professional rugby training programmes, the majority of the variability in training load measures was explained by session duration (~60–70%), while a smaller proportion was explained by session intensity (~30%). When modelling the training load, training intensity and duration should be disaggregated to better account for their between-session variability.
Citation
Weaving, D., Dalton-Barron, N., McLaren, S., Scantlebury, S., Cummins, C., Roe, G., Jones, B., Beggs, C., & Abt, G. (2020). The relative contribution of training intensity and duration to daily measures of training load in professional rugby league and union. Journal of sports sciences, 38(14), 1674-1681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1754725
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 24, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 21, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jul 17, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Mar 26, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 22, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Sports Sciences |
Print ISSN | 0264-0414 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 38 |
Issue | 14 |
Pages | 1674-1681 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1754725 |
Keywords | Training load; Principal component analysis; Time series; Rugby |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3480913 |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02640414.2020.1754725?journalCode=rjsp20 |
Additional Information | Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rjsp20; Accepted: 2020-03-23; Published: 2020-04-21 |
Files
Figure 2 (1)
(4.6 Mb)
Other
Figure 1 (1)
(4.2 Mb)
Other
Article
(203 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2020 The authors
You might also like
Multiple measures are needed to quantify training loads in professional rugby league
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search