Feasibility and acceptability evaluation of the PRIDE (Promoting Independence in Dementia) intervention for living well with dementia
Csipke, Emese; Moniz-Cook, Esme; Leung, Phuong; Yates, Lauren; Birt, Linda; Walton, Holly; Hogervorst, Eef; Mountain, Gail; Charlesworth, Georgina; Orrell, Martin
Professor Esme Moniz-Cook E.D.Moniz-Cook@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Clinical Psychology of Ageing and Dementia Care Research/ Dementia Research Work Group Lead
Objectives: Post-diagnostic psychosocial interventions could play an important role in supporting people with mild dementia remain independent. The PRIDE intervention was developed to address this.
Method: The mixed methods non-randomised, pre-post feasibility study occurred across England. Facilitators were recruited from the voluntary sector and memory services. Participants and their supporters took part in the 3-session intervention. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and follow-up. To evaluate acceptability, focus groups and interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of participants and facilitators.
Results: Contextual challenges to delivery including national research governance changes, affecting recruitment of study sites. Thirty-four dyads consented, with 14 facilitators providing the intervention. Dyads took part in at least two sessions (79%), and 73% in all three. Outcome measures were completed by 79% without difficulty, with minimal missing data. No significant changes were found on pre and post assessments. Post-hoc analysis found moderate effect size improvements for self-management (SMAS instrument) in people with dementia (d=0 .41) and quality of life (EQ5D measure) in carers (d=0.40). Qualitative data indicated that dyads found PRIDE acceptable, as did intervention facilitators.
Conclusions: The 3-session intervention was well accepted by participant-dyads and intervention facilitators. A randomised controlled trial of PRIDE would need to carefully consider recruitment potential across geographically varied settings, and site-stratification according to knowledge of contextual factors, such as the diversity of post-diagnostic services across the country. Letting sites themselves be responsible for identifying suitable intervention facilitators was successful. The self-report measures showed potential to be included in the main trial.
Csipke, E., Moniz-Cook, E., Leung, P., Yates, L., Birt, L., Walton, H., …Orrell, M. (in press). Feasibility and acceptability evaluation of the PRIDE (Promoting Independence in Dementia) intervention for living well with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220001386
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Jun 19, 2020|
|Online Publication Date||Aug 27, 2020|
|Deposit Date||Jul 30, 2020|
|Publicly Available Date||Feb 28, 2021|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Cognitive decline; Dementia; Psychosocial intervention; Research design and methodology; Community care|
Publisher Licence URL
©2020 University of Hull
You might also like
Getting our terminology right: the power of language
Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial