Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: A qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPS

Jefferson, Laura; Atkin, Karl; Sheridan, Rebecca; Oliver, Steven; Macleod, Una; Hall, Geoff; Forbes, Sarah; Green, Trish; Allgar, Victoria; Knapp, Peter

Authors

Laura Jefferson

Karl Atkin

Rebecca Sheridan

Steven Oliver

Geoff Hall

Sarah Forbes

Trish Green

Victoria Allgar

Peter Knapp



Abstract

© British Journal of General Practice
Background: The 2-week-wait urgent referral policy in the UK has sought to improve cancer outcomes by accelerating diagnosis and treatment. However, around 5-7% of symptomatic referred patients cancel or do not attend their hospital appointment. While subsequent cancer diagnosis was less likely in non-attenders, those with a diagnosis had worse early mortality outcomes.
Aim: To examine how interpersonal, communication, social, and organisational factors influence a patient's non-attendance.
Design and setting: Qualitative study in GP practices in one Northern English city.
Method: In-depth, individual interviews were undertaken face-to-face or by telephone between December 2016 and May 2018, followed by thematic framework analysis.
Results: In this study 21 GPs, and 24 patients who did not attend or had cancelled their appointment were interviewed, deriving a range of potential explanations for non-attendance, including: system flaws; GP difficulties with booking appointments; patient difficulties with navigating the appointment system, particularly older patients and those from more deprived areas; patients leading 'difficult lives'; and patients' expectations of the referral, informed by their beliefs, circumstances, priorities, and the perceived prognosis. GPs recognised the importance of communication with the patient, particularly the need to tailor communication to perceived patient understanding and anxiety. GPs and practices varied in their responses to patient non-attendance, influenced by time pressures and perceptions of patient responsibility.
Conclusion: Failure to be seen within 2 weeks of urgent referral resulted from a number of patient and provider factors. The urgent referral process in general practice and cancer services should accommodate patient perceptions and responses, facilitate referral and attendance, and enable responses to patient non-attendance.

Citation

Jefferson, L., Atkin, K., Sheridan, R., Oliver, S., Macleod, U., Hall, G., Forbes, S., Green, T., Allgar, V., & Knapp, P. (2019). Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: A qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPS. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 69(689), E850-E859. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X706625

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 20, 2019
Online Publication Date Nov 28, 2019
Publication Date 2019-12
Deposit Date Apr 19, 2022
Publicly Available Date Apr 22, 2022
Journal British Journal of General Practice
Print ISSN 0960-1643
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 69
Issue 689
Pages E850-E859
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X706625
Keywords cancer; communication; diagnosis; no-show patients; primary health care; socioeconomic factors
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3607514

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations