The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: A systematic review

Jones, Daniel; Friend, Charlotte; Dreher, Andreas; Allgar, Victoria; Macleod, Una

Abstract

© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK. NICE guidelines on recognition and referral of suspected cancer, recommend performing digital rectal examination (DRE) on patients with urinary symptoms and urgently referring if the prostate feels malignant. However, this is based on the results of one case control study, so it is not known if DRE performed in primary care is an accurate method of detecting prostate cancer. Methods: The aim of this review is to ascertain the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of DRE for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched in august 2015 for studies in which a DRE was performed in primary care on symptomatic patients and compared against a reference diagnostic procedure. Results: Four studies were included with a total of 3225 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for DRE as a predictor of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients was 28.6 and 90.7%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 42.3 and 84.2%, respectively. Conclusion: This review found that DRE performed in general practice is accurate, and supports the UK NICE guidelines that patients with a malignant prostate on examination are referred urgently for suspected prostate cancer. Abnormal DRE carried a 42.3% chance of malignancy, above the 3% risk threshold which NICE guidance suggests warrants an urgent referral. However this review questions the benefit of performing a DRE in primary care in the first instance, suggesting that a patient's risk of prostate cancer based on symptoms alone would warrant urgent referral even if the DRE feels normal.

Citation

Jones, D., Friend, C., Dreher, A., Allgar, V., & Macleod, U. (2018). The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: A systematic review. BMC family practice, 19(1), Article 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0765-y

• Journal Article Type: Review
• Acceptance Date: May 18, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Jun 2, 2018
• Publication Date: Jun 2, 2018
• Deposit Date: Apr 19, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 21, 2022
• Journal: BMC Family Practice
• Print ISSN: 1471-2296
• Electronic ISSN: 1471-2296
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: 79
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0765-y
• Keywords: General practice; Digital rectal examination; Prostate cancer; Primary care; Early diagnosis
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3607557