Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Do early warning track and trigger tools improve patient outcomes? A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis

Credland, Nicola; Dyson, Judith; Johnson, Miriam J.

Authors

Judith Dyson



Abstract

Aim
To determine the effect of Early Warning Track and Trigger Tools on patient outcomes.

Design
A systematic review: synthesis without meta‐analysis.

Data sources
Electronic databases were searched from 1 January 2013–1 August 2018 and 221 papers identified.

Review methods
A systematic review and narrative synthesis supported the identification of synthesized findings named and reported according to outcome measure.

RESULTS
Five international papers representing over 74,000 patients were included in the analysis. Seven key findings were identified, the impact of NEWS on: (a) cardiopulmonary arrest; (b) mortality; (c) serious adverse events; (d) length of hospital stay; (e) hospital admissions; (f) observation frequency; and (g) Intensive/High dependency Unit admission. Papers identified statistically significant improvements in mortality, serious adverse events, hospital admissions, observation frequency, and intensive care unit/high dependency unit admission when an Early Warning Track and Trigger protocol is in use. There were conflicting results regarding length of stay and cardiopulmonary arrest data.

Conclusion
Early Warning Track and Trigger Tools can aid recognition of deteriorating patients. Further research is required in relation to hospital length of stay and cardiopulmonary arrests.

Impact
Early warning track and trigger tools have been implemented nationally and to a lesser degree internationally. There is evidence to suggest improved clinical outcomes following their use. Further research needs to combine the use of the National Early Warning Score with an agreed set of measured outcomes, and then subsequent study data could be combined to provide much stronger levels of evidence.

Citation

Credland, N., Dyson, J., & Johnson, M. J. (in press). Do early warning track and trigger tools improve patient outcomes? A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14619

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Oct 6, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 30, 2020
Deposit Date Nov 2, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 31, 2021
Journal Journal of Advanced Nursing
Print ISSN 0309-2402
Electronic ISSN 1365-2648
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14619
Keywords Deteriorating patient; Early warning score; Nurse; Nursing; Recognition and response; Systematic review
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3651250
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.14619

Files

Article (174 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
©2020 The authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder





You might also like



Downloadable Citations