Nicola Credland
Do early warning track and trigger tools improve patient outcomes? A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis
Credland, Nicola; Dyson, Judith; Johnson, Miriam J.
Abstract
Aim
To determine the effect of Early Warning Track and Trigger Tools on patient outcomes.
Design
A systematic review: synthesis without meta‐analysis.
Data sources
Electronic databases were searched from 1 January 2013–1 August 2018 and 221 papers identified.
Review methods
A systematic review and narrative synthesis supported the identification of synthesized findings named and reported according to outcome measure.
RESULTS
Five international papers representing over 74,000 patients were included in the analysis. Seven key findings were identified, the impact of NEWS on: (a) cardiopulmonary arrest; (b) mortality; (c) serious adverse events; (d) length of hospital stay; (e) hospital admissions; (f) observation frequency; and (g) Intensive/High dependency Unit admission. Papers identified statistically significant improvements in mortality, serious adverse events, hospital admissions, observation frequency, and intensive care unit/high dependency unit admission when an Early Warning Track and Trigger protocol is in use. There were conflicting results regarding length of stay and cardiopulmonary arrest data.
Conclusion
Early Warning Track and Trigger Tools can aid recognition of deteriorating patients. Further research is required in relation to hospital length of stay and cardiopulmonary arrests.
Impact
Early warning track and trigger tools have been implemented nationally and to a lesser degree internationally. There is evidence to suggest improved clinical outcomes following their use. Further research needs to combine the use of the National Early Warning Score with an agreed set of measured outcomes, and then subsequent study data could be combined to provide much stronger levels of evidence.
Citation
Credland, N., Dyson, J., & Johnson, M. J. (in press). Do early warning track and trigger tools improve patient outcomes? A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14619
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 6, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 30, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Nov 2, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 31, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Advanced Nursing |
Print ISSN | 0309-2402 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14619 |
Keywords | Deteriorating patient; Early warning score; Nurse; Nursing; Recognition and response; Systematic review |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3651250 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.14619 |
Files
Article
(174 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2020 The authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder
You might also like
More than signposting: Findings from an evaluation of a social prescribing service
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search