Dr Phil Bielby P.Bielby@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Law
Towards supported decision-making in biomedical research with cognitively vulnerable adults
Bielby, Philip
Authors
Contributors
Oonagh Corrigan
Editor
John McMillan
Editor
Kathleen Liddell
Editor
Martin Richards
Editor
Charles Weijer
Editor
Abstract
This chapter has two connected aims. First, I argue that we can best understand the scope and limits of consent as a ‘procedural’ principle of empowerment. I ground this argument in a rationalist moral theory of human (or agency) rights devised by Alan Gewirth. Drawing on the recent work of Gewirthian legal theorists Beyleveld and Brownsword, I offer a defence of the ethical significance of consent as a procedural human rights value, which does not in itself constitute a substantive human right. My second aim is to propose a theory of supported decision-making in biomedical research that seeks to nurture the abilities of cognitively vulnerable participants to make decisions. This reframes consent as the basis of the empowerment of cognitively vulnerable adults. In the final section, I assess the legal prospects for supported decision-making, with particular reference to English law. Although no explicit provision for supported decision-making in research currently exists in English law, there appears to be some limited scope for accommodation.
Citation
Bielby, P. (2009). Towards supported decision-making in biomedical research with cognitively vulnerable adults. In O. Corrigan, J. McMillan, K. Liddell, M. Richards, & C. Weijer (Eds.), The limits of consent: A socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine (151-170). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199231461.003.0009
Publication Date | Jan 29, 2009 |
---|---|
Deposit Date | Dec 19, 2014 |
Journal | The limits of consent: a socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 151-170 |
Book Title | The limits of consent: A socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine |
Chapter Number | 9 |
ISBN | 9780199231461 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199231461.003.0009 |
Keywords | Bioethics, Medical Law, |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/370784 |
Publisher URL | http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231461.001.0001/acprof-9780199231461-chapter-9 |
Contract Date | Dec 19, 2014 |
You might also like
Not ‘us’ and ‘them’: towards a normative legal theory of mental health vulnerability
(2018)
Journal Article
Justifying mental health rights from a Gewirthian perspective
(2016)
Book Chapter
Research on Patients with Dementia
(2014)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search