Silviya P. Doneva
Action or attention in social inhibition of return?
Doneva, Silviya P.; Atkinson, Mark A.; Skarratt, Paul A.; Cole, Geoff G.
Mark A. Atkinson
Paul A. Skarratt
Geoff G. Cole
When two individuals alternate reaching responses to targets located in a visual display, reaction times are longer when responses are directed to where the co-actor just responded. Although an abundance of work has examined the many characteristics of this phenomenon it is not yet known why the effect occurs. In particular, some authors have argued that action representation mechanisms are central to the effect. However, here we present evidence in support of an account in which the representation of action is not necessary. First, the basic effect occurs even when participants cannot see their co-actor’s movement but, importantly, have their attention shifted to a target side via an attentional cue. Second, its time course is too short-lasting to function effectively as a component of action planning. Finally, unlike other joint action phenomena, the effect is not modulated by higher order mechanisms concerned with the personal attributes of a co-actor. Taken together, these results suggest that this particular joint action phenomenon is due to attentional rather than action mechanisms.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jan 1, 2017|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Doneva, S. P., Atkinson, M. A., Skarratt, P. A., & Cole, G. G. (2017). Action or attention in social inhibition of return?. Psychological research, 81(1), 43-54. doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0738-x|
|Keywords||Social IOR, Action representation, Selective attention, Joint Simon effect|
|Copyright Statement||©2017 University of Hull|
|Additional Information||This is a description of an article which has been published in: Psychological research, 2016, v.81 issue 1.|
©2017 University of Hull
You might also like
Computerized stimuli for studying oddity effects
The role of transients in action observation
Are goal states represented during kinematic imitation?
Real person interaction in visual attention research