Mapping and characterising electronic palliative care coordination systems and their intended impact: A national survey of end-of-life care commissioners

Birtwistle, Jacqueline; Millares-Martin, Pablo; Evans, Catherine J.; Foy, Robbie; Relton, Samuel; Richards, Suzanne; Sleeman, Katherine E.; Twiddy, Maureen; Bennett, Michael I.; Allsop, Matthew J.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In England, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) were introduced in 2008 to support care coordination and delivery in accordance with patient preferences. Despite policy supporting their implementation, there has been a lack of rigorous evaluation of EPaCCS and it is not clear how they have been translated into practice. This study sought to examine the current national implementation of EPaCCS, including their intended impact on patient and service outcomes, and barriers and facilitators for implementation. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey of end-of-life care commissioning leads for Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England. We enquired about the current implementation status of EPaCCS, their role in information sharing and intended impact, and requested routine patient-level data relating to EPaCCS. RESULTS: Out of 135 CCGs, 85 (63.0%) responded, with 57 (67.1%) having operational EPaCCS. Use of EPaCCS were confined to healthcare providers with most systems (67%) not supporting information sharing with care homes and social care providers. Most systems (68%) sought to facilitate goal concordant care, although there was inconsonance between intended impacts and monitoring measures used. Common challenges to implementation included healthcare professionals' limited engagement. Only one-third of patients had an EPaCCS record at death with limited recording of patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Critical gaps exist in engagement with EPaCCS and their ability to facilitate information sharing across care providers. The limited alignment between stated goals of EPaCCS and their monitoring impedes efforts to understand which characteristics of systems can best support care delivery.

Citation

Birtwistle, J., Millares-Martin, P., Evans, C. J., Foy, R., Relton, S., Richards, S., Sleeman, K. E., Twiddy, M., Bennett, M. I., & Allsop, M. J. (2022). Mapping and characterising electronic palliative care coordination systems and their intended impact: A national survey of end-of-life care commissioners. PLoS ONE, 17(10), Article e0275991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275991

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 27, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Oct 14, 2022
• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2022
• Deposit Date: Apr 8, 2025
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 10, 2025
• Journal: PloS one
• Print ISSN: 1932-6203
• Publisher: Public Library of Science
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 10
• Article Number: e0275991
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275991
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4105866