Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches

Chowdhury, M Jashim Ali

Authors



Abstract

This article compares the internal proceedings jurisprudence of the highest courts of the United Kingdom (UK), India, and Bangladesh. Though the Supreme Courts of Bangladesh and India have shown general deference to the debates in parliament, they have shown willingness to lift the veil of those “internal proceedings” that might have constitutional questions involved. It appears that the UK, India, and Bangladesh’s respective models of judicial review and parliament-judiciary relationship influence their internal proceedings jurisprudence. While the Indian and Bangladeshi Supreme Courts’ understandings of the internal proceedings doctrine are conditioned by their self aggrandised posture of guardianship over the Constitution, the British judiciary’s approach is largely dialogic and conciliatory. Indian and Bangladeshi Supreme Courts’ adversarial approach frequently places them in direct confrontation with the legislative and political branches. While the Indian Supreme Court does not shy away from such confrontation, Bangladesh Supreme Court usually tries to avoid it and, in the process, ends up taking fluctuating and self-contradictory positions in different cases. The author argues that the UK’s dialogic model of judicial review provides for a rather congenial basis for principled judicial consideration of the internal proceedings doctrine.

Citation

Chowdhury, M. J. A. (2021). Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Journal, 6(1), 28-57

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 19, 2021
Online Publication Date Oct 26, 2021
Publication Date Oct 26, 2021
Deposit Date Nov 22, 2022
Publicly Available Date Nov 25, 2022
Journal Comparative Constitutional and Administrative Law Journal
Print ISSN 2582-9807
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 1
Article Number 2
Pages 28-57
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4131501
Publisher URL https://www.calq.in/_files/ugd/6cd5fc_c050230d2dae4b7c9e8ceed3bb042aab.pdf

Files

Journal issue (1.7 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© National Law University, Jodhpur




You might also like



Downloadable Citations