Dr Jashim Chowdhury J.Chowdhury@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Law
Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches
Chowdhury, M Jashim Ali
Authors
Abstract
This article compares the internal proceedings jurisprudence of the highest courts of the United Kingdom (UK), India, and Bangladesh. Though the Supreme Courts of Bangladesh and India have shown general deference to the debates in parliament, they have shown willingness to lift the veil of those “internal proceedings” that might have constitutional questions involved. It appears that the UK, India, and Bangladesh’s respective models of judicial review and parliament-judiciary relationship influence their internal proceedings jurisprudence. While the Indian and Bangladeshi Supreme Courts’ understandings of the internal proceedings doctrine are conditioned by their self aggrandised posture of guardianship over the Constitution, the British judiciary’s approach is largely dialogic and conciliatory. Indian and Bangladeshi Supreme Courts’ adversarial approach frequently places them in direct confrontation with the legislative and political branches. While the Indian Supreme Court does not shy away from such confrontation, Bangladesh Supreme Court usually tries to avoid it and, in the process, ends up taking fluctuating and self-contradictory positions in different cases. The author argues that the UK’s dialogic model of judicial review provides for a rather congenial basis for principled judicial consideration of the internal proceedings doctrine.
Citation
Chowdhury, M. J. A. (2021). Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Journal, 6(1), 28-57
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 19, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 26, 2021 |
Publication Date | Oct 26, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Nov 22, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 25, 2022 |
Journal | Comparative Constitutional and Administrative Law Journal |
Print ISSN | 2582-9807 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 2 |
Pages | 28-57 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4131501 |
Publisher URL | https://www.calq.in/_files/ugd/6cd5fc_c050230d2dae4b7c9e8ceed3bb042aab.pdf |
Files
Journal issue
(1.7 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
© National Law University, Jodhpur
You might also like
Amendment Rules, Politics and Debates in Bangladesh
(2024)
Book Chapter
Parliament of Bangladesh: Constitutional Position and Contributions
(2023)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search