Fatma Calili-Cankir
Air-breathing versus conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A parametric numerical study
Calili-Cankir, Fatma; Ismail, Mohammed S.; Ingham, Derek B.; Hughes, Kevin J.; Ma, Lin; Pourkashanian, Mohamed
Authors
Dr Mohammed Ismail m.s.ismail@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer - Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies
Derek B. Ingham
Kevin J. Hughes
Lin Ma
Mohamed Pourkashanian
Abstract
Two mathematical models have been built for air-breathing and conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells to explore the reasons affecting the cell performance. A parametric study has been conducted to (i) investigate how each type of fuel cells responds to changes in some key parameters and (ii) consequently obtain some insights on how to improve the performance of the air-breathing fuel cell. The conventional fuel cell significantly outperforms the air-breathing fuel cell and this is due to substantially higher forced convection-related heat and mass transfer coefficients associated with the conventional fuel cell as compared with natural convection-related heat and mass transfer coefficients associated with air-breathing fuel cell. The two types of fuel cell respond differently to changes in porosity and thickness of gas diffusion layer: the conventional fuel cell performs better with increasing porosity of gas diffusion layer (from 0.4 to 0.8) and decreasing thickness of gas diffusion layer (from 700 to 100 μm) while the air-breathing fuel cell performs better with decreasing porosity and increasing thickness of gas diffusion layer. Further, the air-breathing fuel cell was found to be more sensitive to membrane thickness and less sensitive to electrical resistance compared to conventional fuel cell.
Citation
Calili-Cankir, F., Ismail, M. S., Ingham, D. B., Hughes, K. J., Ma, L., & Pourkashanian, M. (2022). Air-breathing versus conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A parametric numerical study. Energy, 250, Article 123827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123827
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 25, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 28, 2022 |
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jan 21, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 23, 2023 |
Journal | Energy |
Print ISSN | 0360-5442 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 250 |
Article Number | 123827 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123827 |
Keywords | Air-breathing PEFCs; Conventional PEFCs; Natural convection; Forced convection; Heat and mass transfer |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4186473 |
Files
Published article
(5.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
Al2O3–H2O nanofluids for cooling PEM fuel cells: A critical assessment
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search