Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Dynamic models for air-breathing and conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A comparative study

Calili-Cankir, Fatma; Ismail, Mohammed S.; Berber, Mohamed R.; Alrowaili, Ziyad A.; Ingham, Derek B.; Hughes, Kevin J.; Ma, Lin; Pourkashanian, Mohamed

Authors

Fatma Calili-Cankir

Profile image of Mohammed Ismail

Dr Mohammed Ismail m.s.ismail@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer - Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies

Mohamed R. Berber

Ziyad A. Alrowaili

Derek B. Ingham

Kevin J. Hughes

Lin Ma

Mohamed Pourkashanian



Abstract

Two dynamic models have been built for air-breathing and conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) in order to comparatively investigate the impacts of some key parameters on the transient response to load alterations and the steady-state performance for each fuel cell type. It was found that with load alterations, the dynamic response of the air-breathing PEFC is significantly slower than that of the conventional PEFC and this is due to significantly slower heat transfer coefficients associated with natural convection taking place at the surface of the exposed-to-the ambient cathode GDL. Namely, lower heat transfer coefficient results in poor heat dissipation that eventually leads to: significantly higher and less-responsive-to-load changes cell temperature (compared to those of the conventional PEFC) and subsequently higher ohmic and activation losses. Further, the dynamic and the steady-state performance of the air-breathing PEFC was found to increase with decreasing GDL porosity, decreasing membrane thickness and, to a lesser extent, decreasing overall electrical resistance. These effects are significantly less profound on the performance of the conventional PEFC. All the above findings have been described and discussed in the paper.

Citation

Calili-Cankir, F., Ismail, M. S., Berber, M. R., Alrowaili, Z. A., Ingham, D. B., Hughes, K. J., …Pourkashanian, M. (2022). Dynamic models for air-breathing and conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A comparative study. Renewable energy, 195, 1001-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.092

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 18, 2022
Online Publication Date Jun 22, 2022
Publication Date 2022-08
Deposit Date Jan 21, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jan 23, 2023
Journal Renewable Energy
Print ISSN 0960-1481
Electronic ISSN 1879-0682
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 195
Pages 1001-1014
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.092
Keywords Air-breathing PEFCs; Conventional PEFCs; Dynamic model; Transient response; Load alterations
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4186517

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations