Dr Jashim Chowdhury J.Chowdhury@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Law
In the 1950s, India’s founding fathers spent considerable time secularising its national identity. Later in 1976, a constitutional amendment placed ‘Secularism’ in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. The Indian Supreme Court showed a strong reverence for Secularism from the 1970s to early 1990s. However, the post-1995 Supreme Court got swayed away by the rise of extremist Hindu nationalism, craftily limited the ambit of Secularism, and endorsed an alternative definition of religious tolerance based on the teachings of ancient Hindu texts. We argue that while the mid-1990s’ Hindutva judgments of the Indian Supreme Court have permanently damaged the face of Indian Secularism, the later decisions of the Court, including the recent Ayodhya-Babri Mosque judgement, show an unprecedented disregard for constitutional equality for India’s religious minorities, particularly the Muslims. This critical evaluation of the Ayodhya Babri Mosque Judgment shows that almost all of the legal and historical arguments offered by the Indian Supreme Court there are either wrong or deeply flawed. The paradigm shift in Indian Supreme Court’s jurisprudential commitment to secularism and religious equality could only encourage more anti-minority onslaught in the days ahead.
Chowdhury, J., Ahmed, J., & Mamun, M. A. A. (2020). Religious Equality and Secularism in India: A Critical Review of the Ayodhya-Babri Mosque Judgment. Chittagong University Journal of Law, 25, 75-96
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 20, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 30, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2020 |
Deposit Date | May 9, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | May 10, 2024 |
Journal | The Chittagong University Journal of Law |
Print ISSN | 2073-5448 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 25 |
Article Number | 5 |
Pages | 75-96 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4290759 |
Accepted manuscript
(398 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright Statement
©2024 The authors.
Creative Commons Licence: Attribution-Noncommercial License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Published article
(17.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright Statement
©2024 The authors.
Creative Commons Licence: Attribution-Noncommercial License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Version
Printed Version
Parliament of Bangladesh: Constitutional Position and Contributions
(2023)
Book Chapter
The Parliament (Jatiya Sangsad) of Bangladesh
(2023)
Book Chapter
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search