Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
Hanczakowski, Maciej; Mazzoni, Giuliana
Giuliana Mazzoni G.Mazzoni@hull.ac.uk
Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is the finding of impaired memory performance for information stored in long-term memory due to retrieval of a related set of information. This phenomenon is often assigned to operations of a specialized mechanism recruited to resolve interference during retrieval by deactivating competing memory representations. This inhibitory account is supported by, among others, findings showing that RIF occurs with independent cues not used during retrieval practice. However, these findings are not always consistent. Recently, Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007) have proposed a model that aims at resolving discrepancies concerning cue-independence of RIF. The model predicts that RIF should be present with independent cues when episodic associations are created between independent cues and their targets in the same episodic context that is later used to cue memory during retrieval practice. In the present study we aimed to test this prediction. We associated studied items with semantically unrelated words during the main study phase of the retrieval practice paradigm, and we tested memory with both cues used during retrieval practice (Experiment 2) and episodic associates serving as independent cues (Experiments 3a and 3b). Although RIF was present when the same cues were used during retrieval practice and a final test, contrary to the prediction formulated by Norman et al., RIF failed to emerge when episodic associates were employed as independent cues.
Hanczakowski, M., & Mazzoni, G. (2013). Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007). Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 39(3), (953-958). doi:10.1037/a0030531. ISSN 0278-7393
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||May 1, 2013|
|Publication Date||May 1, 2013|
|Journal||Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|
|Publisher||American Psychological Association|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Linguistics and Language; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; Language and Linguistics|
You might also like
The role of belief in occurrence within autobiographical memory
Cue familiarity and ‘don’t know’ responding in episodic memory tasks