Professor Daniel Carradice D.Carradice@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Clinical and technical outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins
Carradice, D.; Mekako, A. I.; Mazari, F. A. K.; Samuel, N.; Hatfield, J.; Chetter, I. C.
Authors
A. I. Mekako
F. A. K. Mazari
N. Samuel
J. Hatfield
Professor Ian Chetter I.Chetter@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Vascular Surgery
Abstract
Background:This report describes the clinical effectiveness and recurrence rates from a randomized trial of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and surgery for varicose veins.Methods:Some 280 patients were randomized equally using sealed opaque envelopes to two parallel groups: surgery and EVLA. Inclusion criteria included symptomatic disease secondary to primary, unilateral, isolated saphenofemoral junction incompetence, leading to reflux into the great saphenous vein (GSV). Outcomes were: technical success, recurrent varicose veins on clinical examination, patterns of reflux on duplex ultrasound examination, and the effect of recurrence on quality of life, assessed by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ). Assessments were at 1, 6, 12 and 52 weeks after the procedure.Results:Initial technical success was greater following EVLA: 99·3 versus 92·4 per cent (P = 0·005). Surgical failures related mainly to an inability to strip the above-knee GSV. The clinical recurrence rate at 1 year was lower after EVLA: 4·0 versus 20·4 per cent (P < 0·001). The number of patients needed to treat with EVLA rather than surgery to avoid one recurrence at 1 year was 6·3 (95 per cent confidence interval 4·0 to 12·5). Twelve of 23 surgical recurrences were related to an incompetent below-knee GSV and ten to neovascularization. Of five recurrences after EVLA, two were related to neoreflux in the groin tributaries and one to recanalization. Clinical recurrence was associated with worse AVVQ scores (P < 0·001).Conclusion:EVLA treatment had lower rates of clinical recurrence than conventional surgery in the short term. Registration number: NCT00759434 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Citation
Carradice, D., Mekako, A. I., Mazari, F. A. K., Samuel, N., Hatfield, J., & Chetter, I. C. (2011). Clinical and technical outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. British journal of surgery, 98(8), 1117-1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7615
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 6, 2011 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 3, 2011 |
Publication Date | 2011-08 |
Print ISSN | 0007-1323 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2168 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 98 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 1117-1123 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7615 |
Keywords | Recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence; Silicone patch; Saphenoplasty; Nerve injury |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/432739 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bjs.7615 |
You might also like
Combined endovenous laser therapy and ambulatory phlebectomy: refinement of a new technique
(2006)
Journal Article
Antibiotic prophylaxis in varicose vein surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
(2007)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search