Michael Pilling
Exogenous spatial precuing reliably modulates object processing but not object substitution masking
Pilling, Michael; Gellatly, Angus; Argyropoulos, Yiannis; Skarratt, Paul
Authors
Angus Gellatly
Yiannis Argyropoulos
Dr Paul Skarratt P.Skarratt@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Cognitive Psychology
Abstract
Object substitution masking (OSM) is used in behavioral and imaging studies to investigate processes associated with the formation of a conscious percept. Reportedly, OSM occurs only when visual attention is diffusely spread over a search display or focused away from the target location. Indeed, the presumed role of spatial attention is central to theoretical accounts of OSM and of visual processing more generally (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129:481–507, 2000). We report a series of five experiments in which valid spatial precuing is shown to enhance the ability of participants to accurately report a target but, in most cases, without affecting OSM. In only one experiment (Experiment 5) was a significant effect of precuing observed on masking. This is in contrast to the reliable effect shown across all five experiments in which precuing improved overall performance. The results are convergent with recent findings from Argyropoulos, Gellatly, and Pilling (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39:646–661, 2013), which show that OSM is independent of the number of distractor items in a display. Our results demonstrate that OSM can operate independently of focal attention. Previous claims of the strong interrelationship between OSM and spatial attention are likely to have arisen from ceiling or floor artifacts that restricted measurable performance.
Citation
Pilling, M., Gellatly, A., Argyropoulos, Y., & Skarratt, P. (2014). Exogenous spatial precuing reliably modulates object processing but not object substitution masking. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76(6), 1560-1576. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0661-z
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | May 9, 2014 |
Publication Date | 2014-08 |
Deposit Date | May 5, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | May 5, 2016 |
Journal | Attention, perception and psychophysics |
Print ISSN | 1943-3921 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 76 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 1560-1576 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0661-z |
Keywords | 4 dot masking, Spatial attention, Cueing, Visual perception |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/437718 |
Publisher URL | http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2Fs13414-014-0661-z |
Additional Information | The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0661-z. |
Contract Date | May 5, 2016 |
Files
Article.pdf
(228 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 University of Hull
You might also like
Computerized stimuli for studying oddity effects
(2019)
Journal Article
Are goal states represented during kinematic imitation?
(2017)
Journal Article
Real person interaction in visual attention research
(2016)
Journal Article
Action or attention in social inhibition of return?
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search