Kathryn Haynes
Reflexivity in accountancy research
Haynes, Kathryn
Authors
Contributors
Zahirul Hoque
Editor
Lee D. Parker
Editor
Mark A. Covaleski
Editor
Kathryn Haynes
Editor
Abstract
Abstract: The concept of reflexivity has been widely used in social science qualitative research methods for a number of decades, so it is not a new phenomenon. Broadly it refers to the process in which the researcher reflects on data collection and its interpretation. This can occur at a number of levels and from a number of perspectives, as discussed in this chapter, in an active process. Reflexivity relates to all research, whether qualitative or quantitative, since all researchers should adopt a reflexive approach to their data. However, despite qualitative methods becoming more prominent and more accepted within accounting research, they still operate in a context ‘dominated by hypothetico-deductive quantitative methodologies that essentially are reified as “hard”, factual and objective, consonant with the accounting world of numbers’ (Parker, 2012, p. 59), where reflexivity is less often applied. This suggests that the significance of reflexivity as a concept is all the more relevant to contemporary qualitative accounting research since it is central to consideration of the nature of knowledge. Questions about reflexivity are part of debates about ontology, epistemology and methodology. Ontology represents the researcher’s way of being in the world or their world-view on the nature of reality; epistemology represents the philosophical underpinnings about the nature or theory of knowledge and what counts as knowledge in various research traditions; and methodology represents the overarching research strategy and processes of knowledge production, concerned with methods of data collection and forms of analysis used to generate knowledge. The purpose of this chapter is to reflect on those debates, the meaning and application of reflexivity, strategies for reflexive awareness and processes of reflexivity, reflexive research in accounting, and future possibilities for reflexive accounting research.
Citation
Haynes, K. (2017). Reflexivity in accountancy research. In Z. Hoque, L. D. Parker, M. A. Covaleski, & K. Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods. Routledge
Publication Date | Mar 27, 2017 |
---|---|
Deposit Date | Aug 4, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 4, 2018 |
Journal | The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Book Title | The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods |
ISBN | 97811389396777 |
Keywords | Reflexivity |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/441956 |
Publisher URL | Details of the book are available at https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-Qualitative-Accounting-Research-Methods/Hoque-Parker-Covaleski-Haynes/p/book/9781138939677. |
Contract Date | Aug 4, 2016 |
Files
Chapter
(190 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2018 The author
You might also like
Autoethnography in accounting research
(2017)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search