University of Hull logo

Caught between the orientalist–occidentalist polemic: gender mainstreaming as feminist transformation or neocolonial subversion?

Clisby, Suzanne; Enderstein, Athena-Maria

Authors

Dr Suzanne Clisby S.M.Clisby@hull.ac.uk
Postgraduate Director of Gender Studies/ Coordinator of MA Women's and Gender Studies (GEMMA)

Athena-Maria Enderstein

Abstract

Here we provide a critical reading of gender mainstreaming as a potential emancipatory force that has been co-opted within Orientalist-Occidentalist polemics. This remains a critical period in the “mainstreaming” debate, where feminist reappropriation is necessary to repoliticize the concept and reorient development sector focus from tokenistic inclusivity to social transformation. We consider two sides of the debate. In the first scenario, the requirement for gender mainstreaming in international development discourse has not only failed to address its original feminist goals, but has become (or remained) an extension of Orientalist, neocolonial projects to control and “civilize” developing economies. Here, a putative concern for gender equality in development is used as a means to distinguish between the modern, civilized 'One' and the colonial, traditional 'Other'. In the second scenario, gender mainstreaming is held up as all that these “othered” Occidentalist forces stand against; an exemplar of the inappropriate imposition of “Western” moralistic paradigms in non-Western contexts. Ultimately, the co-optation of gendered discourses in development through these Orientalist-Occidentalist polemics serves to obfuscate the continued depoliticization of mainstreaming. A critical question remains: can gender mainstreaming ever transcend this discursive impasse and reassert its feminist transformatory potential?

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Apr 3, 2017
Journal International feminist journal of politics
Print ISSN 1461-6742
Electronic ISSN 1468-4470
Publisher Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 231-246
Institution Citation Clisby, S., & Enderstein, A. (2017). Caught between the orientalist–occidentalist polemic: gender mainstreaming as feminist transformation or neocolonial subversion?. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(2), 231-246. doi:10.1080/14616742.2016.1258262
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2016.1258262
Keywords Co-optation, Feminism, Gender mainstreaming, Occidentalism, Orientalism
Publisher URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616742.2016.1258262
Additional Information Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline....cope&journalCode=rfjp20

Files




You might also like


Downloadable Citations