Suzanne Clisby
Caught between the orientalist–occidentalist polemic: gender mainstreaming as feminist transformation or neocolonial subversion?
Clisby, Suzanne; Enderstein, Athena-Maria
Authors
Athena-Maria Enderstein
Abstract
Here we provide a critical reading of gender mainstreaming as a potential emancipatory force that has been co-opted within Orientalist-Occidentalist polemics. This remains a critical period in the “mainstreaming” debate, where feminist reappropriation is necessary to repoliticize the concept and reorient development sector focus from tokenistic inclusivity to social transformation. We consider two sides of the debate. In the first scenario, the requirement for gender mainstreaming in international development discourse has not only failed to address its original feminist goals, but has become (or remained) an extension of Orientalist, neocolonial projects to control and “civilize” developing economies. Here, a putative concern for gender equality in development is used as a means to distinguish between the modern, civilized 'One' and the colonial, traditional 'Other'. In the second scenario, gender mainstreaming is held up as all that these “othered” Occidentalist forces stand against; an exemplar of the inappropriate imposition of “Western” moralistic paradigms in non-Western contexts. Ultimately, the co-optation of gendered discourses in development through these Orientalist-Occidentalist polemics serves to obfuscate the continued depoliticization of mainstreaming. A critical question remains: can gender mainstreaming ever transcend this discursive impasse and reassert its feminist transformatory potential?
Citation
Clisby, S., & Enderstein, A.-M. (2017). Caught between the orientalist–occidentalist polemic: gender mainstreaming as feminist transformation or neocolonial subversion?. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(2), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2016.1258262
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 7, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 21, 2017 |
Publication Date | Apr 3, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 7, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 21, 2018 |
Journal | International feminist journal of politics |
Print ISSN | 1461-6742 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 231-246 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2016.1258262 |
Keywords | Co-optation, Feminism, Gender mainstreaming, Occidentalism, Orientalism |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/443917 |
Publisher URL | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616742.2016.1258262 |
Additional Information | Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rfjp20 |
Contract Date | Oct 7, 2016 |
Files
Article
(295 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2018 University of Hull
You might also like
Gender games: practical tools for gender analysis
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search