Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Quantitative checklist for autism in toddlers (Q-CHAT). A population screening study with follow-up: The case for multiple time-point screening for autism

Allison, Carrie; Matthews, Fiona E.; Ruta, Liliana; Pasco, Greg; Soufer, Renee; Brayne, Carol; Charman, Tony; Baron-Cohen, Simon

Authors

Carrie Allison

Liliana Ruta

Greg Pasco

Renee Soufer

Carol Brayne

Tony Charman

Simon Baron-Cohen



Abstract

Objective This is a prospective population screening study for autism in toddlers aged 18-30 months old using the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT), with follow-up at age 4. Design Observational study. Setting Luton, Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire in the UK. Participants 13 070 toddlers registered on the Child Health Surveillance Database between March 2008 and April 2009, with follow-up at age 4; 3770 (29%) were screened for autism at 18-30 months using the Q-CHAT and the Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST) at follow-up at age 4. Interventions A stratified sample across the Q-CHAT score distribution was invited for diagnostic assessment (phase 1). The 4-year follow-up included the CAST and the Checklist for Referral (CFR). All with CAST ≥15, phase 1 diagnostic assessment or with developmental concerns on the CFR were invited for diagnostic assessment (phase 2). Standardised diagnostic assessment at both time-points was conducted to establish the test accuracy of the Q-CHAT. Main outcome measures Consensus diagnostic outcome at phase 1 and phase 2. Results At phase 1, 3770 Q-CHATs were returned (29% response) and 121 undertook diagnostic assessment, of whom 11 met the criteria for autism. All 11 screened positive on the Q-CHAT. The positive predictive value (PPV) at a cut-point of 39 was 17% (95% CI 8% to 31%). At phase 2, 2005 of 3472 CASTs and CFRs were returned (58% response). 159 underwent diagnostic assessment, including 82 assessed in phase 1. All children meeting the criteria for autism identified via the Q-CHAT at phase 1 also met the criteria at phase 2. The PPV was 28% (95% CI 15% to 46%) after phase 1 and phase 2. Conclusions The Q-CHAT can be used at 18-30 months to identify autism and enable accelerated referral for diagnostic assessment. The low PPV suggests that for every true positive there would, however, be ∼4-5 false positives. At follow-up, new cases were identified, illustrating the need for continued surveillance and rescreening at multiple time-points using developmentally sensitive instruments. Not all children who later receive a diagnosis of autism are detectable during the toddler period.

Citation

Allison, C., Matthews, F. E., Ruta, L., Pasco, G., Soufer, R., Brayne, C., Charman, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2021). Quantitative checklist for autism in toddlers (Q-CHAT). A population screening study with follow-up: The case for multiple time-point screening for autism. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 5(1), Article e000700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000700

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 22, 2021
Online Publication Date May 28, 2021
Publication Date May 28, 2021
Deposit Date Sep 5, 2024
Publicly Available Date Sep 5, 2024
Journal BMJ Paediatrics Open
Electronic ISSN 2399-9772
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 5
Issue 1
Article Number e000700
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000700
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4451336

Files

Published article (1.1 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Copyright Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:Â https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations