Professor Stephen Dewhurst S.Dewhurst@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Cognitive Psychology
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories: The effect of memory specificity
Dewhurst, Stephen A.; Anderson, Rachel J.; Berry, Donna M.; Garner, Sarah R.
Authors
Dr Rachel Anderson Rachel.Anderson@hull.ac.uk
Reader/Graduate Research Director
Donna M. Berry
Sarah R. Garner
Abstract
Previous research has highlighted the wide individual variability in susceptibility to the false memories produced by the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure [Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22; Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803–814]. The current study investigated whether susceptibility to false memories is influenced by individual differences in the specificity of autobiographical memory retrieval. Memory specificity was measured using the Sentence Completion for Events from the Past Test (SCEPT) [Raes, F., Hermans, D., Williams, J. M. G., & Eelen, P. (2007). A sentence completion procedure as an alternative to the Autobiographical Memory Test for assessing overgeneral memory in non-clinical populations. Memory, 15, 495-507]. Memory specificity did not correlate with correct recognition, but a specific retrieval style was positively correlated with levels of false recognition. It is proposed that the contextual details that frequently accompany false memories of nonstudied lures are more accessible in individuals with specific retrieval styles.
Citation
Dewhurst, S. A., Anderson, R. J., Berry, D. M., & Garner, S. R. (2018). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories: The effect of memory specificity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(7), 1637-1644. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1345961
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 12, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 1, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jun 12, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 28, 2018 |
Journal | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology |
Print ISSN | 1747-0218 |
Electronic ISSN | 1747-0226 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 71 |
Issue | 7 |
Pages | 1637-1644 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1345961 |
Keywords | False memories; Autobiographical memory specificity; Individual differences |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/452269 |
Publisher URL | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470218.2017.1345961 |
Additional Information | This is the accepted manuscript of an article published in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2018. The version of record is available at the DOI link in this record. |
Files
Article
(391 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2018 University of Hull
You might also like
The effect of survival processing on memory for pictures depends on how memory is tested
(2023)
Journal Article
The effect of dysphoria on the relationship between autobiographical memories and the self
(2020)
Journal Article
Simulation, false memories, and the planning of future events
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search