Dr Paul Skarratt P.Skarratt@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Cognitive Psychology
Prioritization of looming and receding objects: Equal slopes, different intercepts
Skarratt, Paul A.; Cole, Geoff G.; Gellatly, Angus R.H.
Authors
Geoff G. Cole
Angus R.H. Gellatly
Abstract
Franconeri and Simons (2003) reported that simulated looming objects (marked by a size increase) captured attention, whereas simulated receding objects (marked by a size decrease) did not. This finding has been challenged with the demonstration that receding objects can capture attention when they move in three-dimensional depth. In the present study, we compared the effects of objects that either loomed or receded in depth. The results of two experiments showed that whereas both motion types benefited from attentional prioritization, as judged by their search slopes, looming objects elicited shorter response times (RTs). We conclude that both motion types attract attention during search; however, the RT advantage for looming motion seems to reflect a processing enhancement that occurs outside of selection and is conferred on the basis of motion direction. © 2009 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Citation
Skarratt, P. A., Cole, G. G., & Gellatly, A. R. (2009). Prioritization of looming and receding objects: Equal slopes, different intercepts. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71(4), 964-970. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.71.4.964
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 30, 2008 |
Publication Date | May 1, 2009 |
Deposit Date | Nov 13, 2014 |
Journal | Attention Perception & Psychophysics |
Print ISSN | 1943-3921 |
Electronic ISSN | 1943-393X |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 71 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 964-970 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3758/app.71.4.964 |
Keywords | Linguistics and Language; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; Sensory Systems; Language and Linguistics |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/460957 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FAPP.71.4.964 |
You might also like
Computerized stimuli for studying oddity effects
(2019)
Journal Article
Are goal states represented during kinematic imitation?
(2017)
Journal Article
Real person interaction in visual attention research
(2016)
Journal Article
Action or attention in social inhibition of return?
(2015)
Journal Article
Peripheral cues and gaze direction jointly focus attention and inhibition of return
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search