Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Reading instruction affects the cognitive skills supporting early reading development

Johnston, Rhona S.; McGeown, Sarah P.; Medford, Emma

Authors

Rhona S. Johnston

Sarah P. McGeown

Emma Medford



Abstract

This study examined the cognitive skills associated with early reading development when children were taught by different types of instruction. Seventy-nine children (mean age at pre-test 4;10 (22 S.D.) and post-test 5;03 (21 S.D.)) were taught to read either by an eclectic approach which included sight-word learning, guessing from context and analytic phonics, or by a synthetic phonics approach, where children were taught solely to sound and blend letters to read unfamiliar words. The results illustrated differences in the skills supporting children's word reading based on their method of reading instruction. For the eclectic group, pre-test letter knowledge, vocabulary and rhyming skills predicted later reading ability, whereas for the synthetic phonics group, letter knowledge, phonemic awareness and memory span predicted later reading skill. The results suggest that children will draw upon different cognitive skills when reading if they are taught to use different word recognition strategies. © 2012.

Citation

Johnston, R. S., McGeown, S. P., & Medford, E. (2012). Reading instruction affects the cognitive skills supporting early reading development. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 360-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.012

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 30, 2012
Online Publication Date Feb 14, 2012
Publication Date Jun 1, 2012
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2014
Journal Learning and Individual Differences
Print ISSN 1041-6080
Electronic ISSN 1744-7682
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 3
Pages 360-364
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.012
Keywords Reading; Phonics; Instruction; Learning
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/464881
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608012000210?via%3Dihub