Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Expert evidence, judicial reasoning, and the family courts information pilot

Ward, Tony

Authors

Tony Ward



Abstract

The Family Courts Information Pilot made a modest step towards open justice in Children Act cases by publishing 160 judgments of the County Courts and Family Proceedings Courts. This article focuses on the reasoning about expert evidence in the judgements, drawing on the epistemology of testimony and the work of Habermas. The courts seek to provide publicly accessible justifications for the acceptance or rejection of expert testimony, and while they are reasonably successful in this task it is often difficult for them to justify a decision in the absence of independent expert evidence in addition to that of the social workers and Children’s Guardians. This supposed over-reliance on expert evidence has been heavily criticised by the Family Justice Review but reducing the use of experts may promote efficiency at the expense of justice.

Citation

Ward, T. (2012). Expert evidence, judicial reasoning, and the family courts information pilot. Journal of Law and Society, 39(4), 515-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00598.x

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Nov 15, 2012
Publication Date Dec 1, 2012
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2014
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Journal Journal of Law and Society
Print ISSN 0263-323x
Electronic ISSN 1467-6478
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages 515-540
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00598.x
Keywords Sociology and Political Science; Law
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/467375
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00598.x

You might also like



Downloadable Citations