Fit for purpose: traditional assessment is failing undergraduates with learning difficulties. Might eAssessment help?
Williams, Peter; Wray, Jane; Farrall, Helen; Aspland, Jo
Dr Jane Wray J.Wray@hull.ac.uk
Director of Research, Senior Lecturer in Nursing
Mrs Helen Farrall H.J.Farrall@hull.ac.uk
Recent years have seen unprecedented growth in the size, diversity and academic orientation of undergraduate student populations. There is evidence that the use of innovative pedagogies using information and communications technology has the potential to address such student diversity by offering opportunities for a more personalised student learning experience. However, ways of assessing student work in such personalised learning contexts have remained a challenge for most English universities, dominated by traditional high stakes, timed exercises. Being almost always text-intensive, these can prove particularly stressful and disadvantageous for the growing numbers of students with specific learning difficulties (SpLD). Such challenges are examined in relation to national requirements and exemplified in the SpLD strategies developed in two faculties of an English university. The paper defines key principles and practices to be realised in order for assessment to be considered fit for purpose. Using these as criteria, traditional assessment is compared to new ways of evaluating student progress that are personalised, integral to and embedded in the learning process. It is concluded that computer-based assessment (eAssessment) offers fairer and more inclusive ways of monitoring, diagnosing, supporting learning and reporting students' achievements.
Williams, P., Wray, J., Farrall, H., & Aspland, J. (2014). Fit for purpose: traditional assessment is failing undergraduates with learning difficulties. Might eAssessment help?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(6), 614-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.802029
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Apr 23, 2013|
|Online Publication Date||Jun 6, 2013|
|Publication Date||Jun 3, 2014|
|Deposit Date||Nov 13, 2014|
|Publicly Available Date||Nov 13, 2014|
|Journal||International journal of inclusive education|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); Education|
|Additional Information||Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=tied20|
© 2014 University of Hull
You might also like
Does competency-based education with blockchain signal a new mission for universities?
Squaring the circle: a new alternative to alternative-assessment
Plotting virtuality : dimensions of eLearning space
Beyond control : will blended learning subvert national curricula?
Assessment Futures: 21st Century methods for 21st Century needs
Presentation / Conference