Dr Christopher Fear C.Fear@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Politics and International Relations
"Was he right?" R. G. Collingwood's rapprochement between philosophy and history
Fear, Christopher
Authors
Abstract
© koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2017. R. G. Collingwood's declaration that belief in "eternal questions" in philosophy is "merely a vulgar error, consequent on a kind of historical myopia which, deceived by superficial resemblances, failed to detect profound differences" has been vigorously discussed over the last sixty years, thanks partly to its resurrection by Quentin Skinner. But another of Collingwood's provocative claims has been relatively neglected. If the claims and arguments of classic authors in the history of philosophy provide answers to questions that are not ours, but that are in fact limited to the context of their own time; and if the purpose of history is to illuminate those answers in light of their historical contexts, should historians ask - as Collingwood claimed they "must" - not only "what was So-and-so's theory on such and such a matter?", but also "was he right?"? Should the historian of ideas in a world of changing questions nevertheless describe a theory as "false" or "true", as Collingwood does, or is truth assessment no proper part of the history of philosophy? This essay draws on the full range of Collingwood's writings, and presents his strongest case for the claim that historians "must" ask "the truth question" about old philosophy.
Citation
Fear, C. (2017). "Was he right?" R. G. Collingwood's rapprochement between philosophy and history. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 11(3), 408-424. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341382
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 28, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 10, 2017 |
Publication Date | Nov 7, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Nov 27, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 8, 2019 |
Journal | Journal of the Philosophy of History |
Print ISSN | 1872-261X |
Publisher | Brill Academic Publishers |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 408-424 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341382 |
Keywords | RG Collingwood; History of ideas; Philosophy of history; Methodology; Contextualism |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/475284 |
Publisher URL | https://brill.com/abstract/journals/jph/11/3/article-p408_408.xml |
Contract Date | May 13, 2019 |
Files
Article
(198 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2019 University of Hull
You might also like
The General Elections: 2015, 2017, 2019
(2023)
Book Chapter
“Sophists in academic dress: Oakeshott’s ‘The study of “politics” in a university’”
(2022)
Journal Article
L’odissea degli oikofobi: Roger Scruton su Dove siamo
(2021)
Book Chapter
The ‘dialectical’ theory of conservatism
(2020)
Journal Article
R. G. Collingwood's overlapping ideas of history
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search