Philip Kamau
Gendered farmer perceptions towards soil nutrition and willingness to pay for a cafetière-style filter system for in-situ soil testing: evidence from Central Kenya
Kamau, Philip; Ndirangu, Ibrahim; Richardson, Samantha; Pamme, Nicole; Gitaka, Jesse
Authors
Ibrahim Ndirangu
Dr Samantha Richardson Samantha.Richardson@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Biochemsitry
Nicole Pamme
Jesse Gitaka
Abstract
Soil nutrition is a key pillar in agricultural productivity. However, point-of-need testing for soil nutrition is not readily available in resource-limited settings such as Kenya. We set out to study the perceived need for soil testing among farmers in this country. A group of 547 farmers from Murang'a and Kiambu counties in central Kenya were recruited through multi-stage sampling to help assess the perceptions and willingness to pay (WTP) toward a prototype technology for surveillance of in-situ soil nutrition. The technology is based on a cafetière-style filter system for extraction and a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) for nutrient readout. We employed the double bounded choice contingent valuation method (CVM) to analyze the willingness of farmers to accept and pay for the prototype if the technology was available on the market. It was found that currently, only 1.5 % of farmers carry out soil testing. The high costs of analysis at testing centers, which are often far from the farmers, are among the main reasons contributing to the majority of farmers not testing their soils. The farmers surveyed were generally willing to make their soil data publicly accessible, especially to extension officers. CVM showed that uncontrolled WTP had a 94.24 % premium above KSh1,000 ($6.60) incurred by using the existing rapid testing method. Factoring the control variables and disaggregating the model into gender categories, the findings showed that youth, women, and men had WTP values of KSh1,612.53 ($10.75), KSh1,558.68 ($10.39), and KSh1,504.83 ($10.03), respectively, indicating that farmers can indeed pay for the convenience to test their soils in situ. Through the democratization of soil nutrition data, extension agents can enhance the improvement of agricultural productivity, which implies that farmers can commercialize their agricultural activities.
Citation
Kamau, P., Ndirangu, I., Richardson, S., Pamme, N., & Gitaka, J. (2024). Gendered farmer perceptions towards soil nutrition and willingness to pay for a cafetière-style filter system for in-situ soil testing: evidence from Central Kenya. Heliyon, 10(18), Article e37568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37568
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 5, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 18, 2024 |
Publication Date | Sep 30, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Sep 17, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 20, 2024 |
Journal | Heliyon |
Print ISSN | 2405-8440 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 18 |
Article Number | e37568 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37568 |
Keywords | soil nutrition, in-situ soil testing, paper-based analytical devices, willingness to pay |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4832009 |
End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Files
Published article
(2.3 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search