Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparative analysis and optimization of performance of air-breathing and conventional PEM fuel cells

Abdulrahman, Faseeh; Ismail, Mohammed S.; Sarathy, S. Mani

Authors

Faseeh Abdulrahman

Profile image of Mohammed Ismail

Dr Mohammed Ismail m.s.ismail@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer - Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies

S. Mani Sarathy



Abstract

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a critical part of the energy transition as they can be sustainably powered by hydrogen fuel. They have gained significant attention recently due to their compact design and simplified system, which makes them ideal for portable applications. This paper presents a first-of-its-kind comparative study of air-breathing and conventional PEMFCs, conducted using a combined approach of numerical modelling and Taguchi analysis. A comprehensive multiphysics one-dimensional model was developed for each type of fuel cell. The results show that the conventional fuel cell outperforms the air-breathing fuel cell, especially at high current densities. This is due to its significantly higher mass and heat transfer coefficients on the cathode side of the conventional fuel cell, which also enhances its heat dissipation. Taguchi analysis ranked specific design parameters by their impact on fuel cell performance, identifying cathode GDL thickness as the most influential. The results of the parametric study using numerical models confirm this ranking and the significance of the factors proposed by Taguchi analysis. Interestingly, the performance of air-breathing PEMFCs is more sensitive to cathode GDL porosity compared to conventional PEMFCs. This increased sensitivity is primarily due to higher diffusion limitations and a lower oxygen mass transport coefficient in air-breathing PEMFCs.

Citation

Abdulrahman, F., Ismail, M. S., & Sarathy, S. M. (2025). Comparative analysis and optimization of performance of air-breathing and conventional PEM fuel cells. Fuel, 390, Article 134723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134723

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 12, 2025
Online Publication Date Feb 19, 2025
Publication Date Jun 15, 2025
Deposit Date Feb 20, 2025
Publicly Available Date Feb 21, 2025
Journal Fuel
Print ISSN 0016-2361
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 390
Article Number 134723
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134723
Keywords Air-breathing PEMFC; Conventional PEMFC; Numerical modelling; Taguchi analysis
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/5043289

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations