Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective

Saramago, Pedro; Gkekas, Athanasios; Arundel, Catherine E; Chetter, Ian C; SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators

Authors

Pedro Saramago

Athanasios Gkekas

Catherine E Arundel

SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators



Abstract

Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used in clinical practice for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI), despite limited evidence regarding its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NPWT for SWHSI, compared with standard dressings, from the perspective of the UK healthcare system.
Methods: An economic model was used to extrapolate the effectiveness results of a meta-analysis over a patient’s lifetime and estimate the costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)) of NPWT and standard dressings. The probability of NPWT being cost-effective was estimated, with extensive scenario analyses conducted to evaluate the robustness of results and the degree of uncertainty.
Results: On average, NPWT was associated with higher costs and marginally higher QALYs than standard dressings. The cost difference was mainly driven by the additional intervention costs associated with NPWT. The estimated probability of NPWT being cost-effective was <30%. There was considerable uncertainty in the findings, driven largely by uncertainty in the estimated pooled relative effect from the meta-analysis. Results were robust to different scenario analyses.
Conclusion: No evidence was found demonstrating that NPWT was a cost-effective alternative to standard dressings for SWHSI.

Citation

Saramago, P., Gkekas, A., Arundel, C. E., Chetter, I. C., & SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators. (2025). Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective. British journal of surgery, 112(5), Article znaf077. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf077

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 16, 2025
Online Publication Date May 6, 2025
Publication Date 2025
Deposit Date Apr 23, 2025
Publicly Available Date May 9, 2025
Print ISSN 0007-1323
Electronic ISSN 1365-2168
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 112
Issue 5
Article Number znaf077
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf077
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/5132094

Files

Published paper (336 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which
permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited





You might also like



Downloadable Citations