Pedro Saramago
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective
Saramago, Pedro; Gkekas, Athanasios; Arundel, Catherine E; Chetter, Ian C; SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators
Authors
Athanasios Gkekas
Catherine E Arundel
Professor Ian Chetter I.Chetter@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Vascular Surgery
SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators
Abstract
Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used in clinical practice for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI), despite limited evidence regarding its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NPWT for SWHSI, compared with standard dressings, from the perspective of the UK healthcare system.
Methods: An economic model was used to extrapolate the effectiveness results of a meta-analysis over a patient’s lifetime and estimate the costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)) of NPWT and standard dressings. The probability of NPWT being cost-effective was estimated, with extensive scenario analyses conducted to evaluate the robustness of results and the degree of uncertainty.
Results: On average, NPWT was associated with higher costs and marginally higher QALYs than standard dressings. The cost difference was mainly driven by the additional intervention costs associated with NPWT. The estimated probability of NPWT being cost-effective was <30%. There was considerable uncertainty in the findings, driven largely by uncertainty in the estimated pooled relative effect from the meta-analysis. Results were robust to different scenario analyses.
Conclusion: No evidence was found demonstrating that NPWT was a cost-effective alternative to standard dressings for SWHSI.
Citation
Saramago, P., Gkekas, A., Arundel, C. E., Chetter, I. C., & SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators. (2025). Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective. British journal of surgery, 112(5), Article znaf077. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf077
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 16, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | May 6, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025 |
Deposit Date | Apr 23, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | May 9, 2025 |
Print ISSN | 0007-1323 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2168 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 112 |
Issue | 5 |
Article Number | znaf077 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf077 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/5132094 |
Files
Published paper
(336 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which
permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search