Dr Christopher Fear C.Fear@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Politics and International Relations
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2017. In recent years, William E. Connolly has argued that the phenomenon of complexity in the physical sciences carries radical implications for political theory: namely, that political theorists should now be revising their concepts of agency, responsibility, and freedom. This very recent project of Connolly's has not (yet) attracted much opposition. Here I offer a critique of Connolly's argument which focuses on three key areas: (1) how he interprets and deploys evidence from physical science; (2) his theory of creative freedom; and (3) the impact that his recent philosophy has on the idea of the intellect. I argue that Connolly's scientific evidence is not what he claims it is; that the theory of creative freedom he offers fails; and that his critique of the intellect fails in theory, and would be highly damaging in practice.
Fear, C. (2017). William E. Connolly's politics of complexity: a critique. Review of Politics, 79(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670516000735
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 23, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 9, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jul 16, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 27, 2022 |
Journal | Review of Politics |
Print ISSN | 0034-6705 |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-6858 |
Publisher | University of Notre Dame |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 79 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 73-98 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670516000735 |
Keywords | Political Science and International Relations; Sociology and Political Science |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/2193689 |
Publisher URL | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-politics/article/william-e-connollys-politics-of-complexity-a-critique/EA1448AAB2BA4E355FCF3F06DA25F13B |
Additional Information | This article has been published in a revised form in Review of politics DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003467051600073. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © copyright holder. |
Article
(196 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in Review of politics <br />
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003467051600073. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © copyright holder.
“Sophists in academic dress: Oakeshott’s ‘The study of “politics” in a university’”
(2022)
Journal Article
L’odissea degli oikofobi: Roger Scruton su Dove siamo
(2021)
Book Chapter
The ‘dialectical’ theory of conservatism
(2020)
Journal Article
R. G. Collingwood's overlapping ideas of history
(2020)
Journal Article
Collingwood's New Leviathan and classical elite theory
(2019)
Journal Article
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Advanced Search