Magnus Ekström
Minimal clinically important differences in average, best, worst and current intensity and unpleasantness of chronic breathlessness
Ekström, Magnus; Johnson, Miriam J.; Huang, Chao; Currow, David C.
Authors
Professor Miriam Johnson Miriam.Johnson@hull.ac.uk
Professor
Dr Chao Huang C.Huang@hull.ac.uk
Reader in Statistics
David C. Currow
Abstract
Copyright ©ERS 2020. BACKGROUND: Chronic breathlessness has devastating consequences. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for current intensity has been estimated as 9 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). We aimed to determine MCIDs for commonly used dimensions and recall periods: the current unpleasantness and current, average, best and worst intensity of the past 24 h for chronic breathlessness. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial of morphine versus placebo over 7 days in people with chronic breathlessness from severe disease. The breathlessness scores were self-reported using a diary each evening on 100-mm VAS. The MCID for improvement in each score was estimated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: 283 participants (mean age 74.2 years; 63% male; 58% COPD; 87.0% modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score 3-4) were included. Anchor-based MCIDs for breathlessness scores ranged from -13.9 mm to -9.5 mm. The MCIDs were similar when using different anchors and across all participants, and participants with more severe breathlessness (mMRC 3-4). Distribution-based effect sizes were classed as small (-4.7-6.3 mm), moderate (-9.4-12.5 mm) and large (-15.0-20.0 mm) effect. Sample sizes for trials using the different scores were proposed. MCIDs of absolute change were more stable than using relative change from baseline. CONCLUSION: An improvement of ∼10 mm on a 100-mm VAS is likely to be clinically meaningful across commonly used measures of chronic breathlessness (current intensity, unpleasantness, and average, best and worst intensity over the past 24 h) to evaluate clinical benefit and effects in therapeutic trials.
Citation
Ekström, M., Johnson, M. J., Huang, C., & Currow, D. C. (2020). Minimal clinically important differences in average, best, worst and current intensity and unpleasantness of chronic breathlessness. European respiratory journal, 56(2), Article 1902202. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02202-2019
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 14, 2020 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Apr 15, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 2, 2021 |
Journal | The European respiratory journal |
Print ISSN | 0903-1936 |
Electronic ISSN | 1399-3003 |
Publisher | European Respiratory Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 56 |
Issue | 2 |
Article Number | 1902202 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02202-2019 |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3496753 |
Publisher URL | https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/56/2/1902202 |
Files
Accepted article
(225 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2020 University of Hull
You might also like
Health service utilisation associated with chronic breathlessness: random population sample
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search